Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3615990
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T22:26:37+00:00 2026-05-18T22:26:37+00:00

One use for the var type in c# seems to be shortcuts/simplifying/save unnecessary typing.

  • 0

One use for the var type in c# seems to be shortcuts/simplifying/save unnecessary typing. One thing that I’ve considered is this:

MyApp.Properties.Settings.Default.Value=1;

That’s a ton of unnecessary code. An alternative to this is declaring:

using MyApp.Properties;

— or —

using appsettings = MyAppp.Properties.Settings;

leading to: appsettings.Default.Value=1 or Settings.Default.Value=1

Abit better, but I’d like it shorter still:

var appsettings = MyFirstCSharpApp.Properties.Settings.Default;
appsettings.Value=1;

Finally, it’s short enough, and it could be used for other annoyingly long calls too but is this an accepted way of doing it? I’m considering whether the “shortcut var” will always be pointing to the existing instance of whatever I’m making a shortcut too? (obviously not just the settings as in this example)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T22:26:37+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 10:26 pm

    It’s acceptable code in that the compiler will take it and know what to do with it. It’s acceptable code logically in that it shortens code later. It’s really not any different than actually defining the variable type (int/bool/whatever) rather than saying var. When you’re in the studio, putting your mouse of the variable gives you its compiled type, so there shouldn’t be any real issue with it. Some might call it lazy, but laziness is the mother of invention. As long as your code doesn’t become unreadable, I can’t see how it would be much of a problem.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to use quoted text in one of node's attributes: var network_json =
how does one use code to do this: produce 15 random numbers [EDIT: from
I have an Expression that converts one type of object to another type. The
I have a collection of objects of one type that I'd like to convert
How does one use rm to delete a file named '--help'? When I try,
What technique shall one use to implement batch insert/update for Backbone.sync?
Why would one use realloc() function to resize an dynamically allocated array rather than
Why would one use func( const Class &value ) rather than just func( Class
How does one use multiprocessing to tackle embarrassingly parallel problems ? Embarassingly parallel problems
How can one use Triggers for Logging History of database changes in MySQL? If

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.