Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 195625
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T16:41:53+00:00 2026-05-11T16:41:53+00:00

… or alternatively an Array which prevents duplicate entries. Is there some kind of

  • 0

… or alternatively an Array which prevents duplicate entries.

Is there some kind of object in Ruby which:

  • responds to [], []= and <<
  • silently drops duplicate entries
  • is Enumerable (or at least supports find_all)
  • preserves the order in which entries were inserted

?

As far as I can tell, an Array supports points 1, 3 and 4; while a Set supports 1, 2 and 3 (but not 4). And a SortedSet won’t do, because my entries don’t implement <=>.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T16:41:53+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 4:41 pm

    There isn’t one as far as I know, and Set by its mathematical nature is meant to be unordered (or at least, implementationally, meant not to guarantee order – in fact its usually implemented as a hash table so it does mess up order).

    However, it’s not hard to either extend array directly or subclass it to do this. I just tried it out and this works:

    class UniqueArray < Array
      def initialize(*args)
        if args.size == 1 and args[0].is_a? Array then
          super(args[0].uniq)
        else
          super(*args)
        end
      end
    
      def insert(i, v)
        super(i, v) unless include?(v)
      end
    
      def <<(v)
        super(v) unless include?(v)
      end
    
      def []=(*args)
        # note: could just call super(*args) then uniq!, but this is faster
    
        # there are three different versions of this call:
        # 1. start, length, value
        # 2. index, value
        # 3. range, value
        # We just need to get the value
        v = case args.size
          when 3 then args[2]
          when 2 then args[1]
          else nil
        end
    
        super(*args) if v.nil? or not include?(v)
      end
    end
    

    Seems to cover all the bases. I used OReilly’s handy Ruby Cookbook as a reference – they have a recipe for “Making sure a sorted array stays sorted” which is similar.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 104k
  • Answers 104k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Short answer is no, cookies are not encrypted in ASP.NET… May 11, 2026 at 8:34 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I think this will solve your problem: $(document).ready(function() { $("#lowerLayer").click(function(e)… May 11, 2026 at 8:34 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer void foo<TOne, TTwo>() where TOne : BaseOne where TTwo :… May 11, 2026 at 8:34 pm

Related Questions

I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is
CGI.escapeHTML is pretty bad, but CGI.unescapeHTML is completely borked. For example: require 'cgi' CGI.unescapeHTML('&#8230;')

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.