Question

Original question

I have a scenario where I have multiple IObservable sequences which I want to combine with Merge and then listen to. However, if one of these produces an error I don’t want it to crash everything for the other streams, as well as to resubscribe to the sequence (this is an ‘ever lasting’ sequence).

I do this by appending a Retry() to the streams before merge, i.e.:

IEnumerable<IObservable<int>> observables = GetObservables();

observables
    .Select(o => o.Retry())
    .Merge()
    .Subscribe(/* Do subscription stuff */);

However, the problem arises when I want to test this. What I would like to test is that if one of the IObservables in observables produces an OnError, the other ones should still be able to send their values through and they should get handled

I thought I’d just use two Subject<int>s representing two IObservables in observables; one sending an OnError(new Exception()) and the other, after that, sending OnNext(1). However, it seems Subject<int> will replay all previous values for a new subscription (which effectively Retry() is), turning the test into an infinite loop.

I tried to solve it by creating a manual IObservable that produces an error on the first subscription and later an empty sequence, but it feels hacky:

var i = 0;
var nErrors = 2;
var testErrorObservableWithOneErrorAndThenCompletion = Observable.Create<int>(o => {
    i++;
    if (i < nErrors) {
        return Observable.Throw<int>(new Exception()).Subscribe(o);
    } else {
        return Observable.Empty<int>().Subscribe(o);
    }
});

Am I using Subject or thinking about Retry() in the wrong way? Any other thoughts on this? How would you solve this situation?

Update

Ok, here’s a marble diagram of what I want and think Retry() does.

o = message, X = error.
------o---o---X
               \
     Retry() -> \---o---o---X
                             \
                   Retry() -> \...

My problem is perhaps more in that I don’t have a good stock class to use fore testing, since Subject wants to replay all of my previous errors.

Update 2

Here’s a test case that shows what I mean about Subject replaying its values. Am I using the term correctly if I say it does this in a cold way? I know Subject is a way of creating a hot observable, but still this behavior feels ‘cold’ to me.

var onNext = false;
var subject = new Subject<int>();

subject.Retry().Subscribe(x => onNext = true);
subject.OnError(new Exception());
subject.OnNext(1);

Assert.That(onNext, Is.True);

Answer 1

Based on your updated requirements (you want to retry the observables that fail, rather than just wanting to ignore them), we can come up with a solution that works.

First, it’s important to understand the difference between a cold observable (recreated on every subscription) and a hot observable (exists regardless of subscriptions). You can’t Retry() a hot observable, as it won’t know how to recreate the underlying events. That is, if a hot observable errors, it’s gone forever.

Subject creates a hot observable, in the sense that you can call OnNext without having subscribers and it will act as expected. To convert a hot observable to a cold observable, you can use Observable.Defer, which will contain the ‘creation on subscription’ logic for that observable.

All that said, here’s the original code modified to do this:

var success = new Subject<int>();
var error = new Subject<int>();

var observables = new List<IObservable<int>> { Observable.Defer(() => {success = new Subject<int>(); return success.AsObservable();}), 
                                               Observable.Defer(() => {error = new Subject<int>(); return error.AsObservable();}) };                                            

observables
.Select(o => o.Retry())
.Merge()
.Subscribe(Console.WriteLine, Console.WriteLine, () => Console.WriteLine("done"));

And the test (similar to before):

success.OnNext(1);
error.OnError(new Exception("test"));
success.OnNext(2);
error.OnNext(-1);
success.OnCompleted();
error.OnCompleted();

And the output as expected:

1
2
-1
done

Of course, you’ll need to modify this concept significantly depending on what you’re underlying observable is. Using subjects for testing is not the same as using them for real.

I also want to note that this comment:

However, it seems Subject will replay all previous values for a
new subscription (which effectively Retry() is), turning the test into
an infinite loop.

Is not true – Subject doesn’t behave this way. There is some other aspect of your code that is causing the infinite loop based on the fact that Retry recreates the subscription, and the subscription creates an error at some point.

---

Original answer (for completion)

The issue is that Retry() doesn’t do what you want it to do. From here:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff708141(v=vs.92).aspx

Repeats the source observable sequence for retryCount times or until
it successfully terminates.

This means that Retry will continually try and reconnect to the underlying observable until it succeeds and doesn’t throw an error.

My understanding is that you actually want exceptions in the observable to be ignored, not retried. This will do what you want instead:

observables
.Select(o => o.Catch((Func<Exception,IObservable<int>>)(e => Observable.Empty<int>())))
.Merge()
.Subscribe(/* subscription code */);

This uses Catch to trap the observable with an exception, and replace it with an empty observable at that point.

Here is a full test using subjects:

var success = new Subject<int>();
var error = new Subject<int>();

var observables = new List<IObservable<int>> { success.AsObservable(), error.AsObservable() };

observables
.Select(o => o.Catch((Func<Exception,IObservable<int>>)(e => Observable.Empty<int>())))
.Merge()
.Subscribe(Observer.Create<int>(Console.WriteLine, Console.WriteLine, () => Console.WriteLine("done")));

success.OnNext(1);
error.OnError(new Exception("test"));
success.OnNext(2);
success.OnCompleted();

And this produces, as expected:

1
2
done