Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5943579
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T16:24:56+00:00 2026-05-22T16:24:56+00:00

Originally a pedantics war on @Als answer here , it also sparked a discussion

  • 0

Originally a pedantics war on @Als answer here, it also sparked a discussion in the C++ chatroom.

This article by Herb Sutter distinguishes between the two, but is also over a decade old, as it clearly was written before 2000 and also talks about the standard draft, which can only mean C++98 draft. Though, I still expect Herb, as part of the committee, to be knowledgeable about this stuff.

I know of this and this question/answer, but the second just cites Herb’s article while the first cites another source that simply rejects the use of the term “heap”, aka they are both not exactly satisfactory. Also, I can’t find any free-store or freestore tag on SO (until this question, I created the former one now).

Now, what is really the difference, if any?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T16:24:57+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 4:24 pm

    Well, the current C++ standard only uses the term “free store” – the only use of “heap” in the Standard is to describe the heap data structure in the Standard Library. So “heap” is not a very useful term to use when trying to discuss C++ problems accurately, though of course everyone does it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I originally asked this question , but in finding an answer, discovered that my
Note: Originally this question was asked for PostgreSQL, however, the answer applies to almost
Originally this bug was posted here: https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/5713-ruby-19-ku-incompatible-with-mem_cache_store And now, as we've run into the
I originally posted this question looking for an answer with using python, got some
I originally posted this at the Amazon SES forums here: https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?threadID=74561&tstart=0 But since the
Originally posted on Server Fault , where it was suggested this question might better
I originally asked this question on RefactorMyCode , but got no responses there... Basically
Originally, I posted this on ServerFault ... but perhaps it is more of a
Originally started here: Django IN query as a string result - invalid literal for
Originally, I was having some issues getting this code to function, but after a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.