Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 452919
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T22:07:14+00:00 2026-05-12T22:07:14+00:00

Our company develops a web application that other companies can license. Typically, our application

  • 0

Our company develops a web application that other companies can license. Typically, our application runs on:

http://www.company.example

And a client’s version of the application is run on:

client.company.example

Usually, a client runs their own site at:

http://www.client.example

Sometimes, clients request to have their version of the application available from:

application.client.example

This kind of setup is often seen with blogs (WordPress, Blogger, Kickapps).

Technically, achieving this “DNS Masking” with a CNAME/A Record and some application configuration is straightforward. I’ve thought out some potential issues related to this, however, and wonder if you can think of any others that I’ve missed:

1) Traffic statistics (as measured by external providers, e.g., compete.com) will be lower since the traffic for company.example won’t include that of application.client.example. (Local stats would not be affected, of course)

2) Potential cookie disclosure from application.client.example to company.example. If the client is setting cookies at .client.example, those cookies could be read by the company.example server.

3) Email Spoofing. Email could be sent from company.example with the domain application.client.example, possibly causing problems with spam blacklisting due to incompatible SPF records.

Thanks for any thoughts on this.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T22:07:14+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 10:07 pm

    CNAME has been widely used for so long, especially by hosting companies. There are no major issues.

    The biggest problem for us is when you have to use HTTPS. It’s very difficult to support multiple CNAMEs on the same server. We use aliases in certificate (SAN extension). We have to get a new cert every time a new CNAME is added in DNS. Other than that, everything works great for us.

    As to the issues you mentioned,

    1. This should be an advantage. It’s a lot easier to combine the stats than to separate them. So we prefer granular reports.
    2. Cookies are not shared between domains, even if they are on the same IP. As long as apps are properly sandboxed on the server, they can’t read each other’s cookie.
    3. You should rate-limit your own outgoing SMTP traffic on the server end so you don’t get blacklisted.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Our company runs a web site (oursite.com) with affiliate partners who send us traffic.
Our company develops big corporate solution for business (web-site). After approving to support Apple
My company develops an IT-infrastructure management software, that we mostly use in Ukraine. Our
The company that I work for develops a C++ application to manage service businesses
My company wants to start mobile web application development, as an addition to our
Our company has a Batch Application which runs every day, It does some database
My company develops several types of applications. A lot of our business comes from
Our company uses an app that was originally ColdFusion + Access later converted to
Our company has a project that right now uses nginx as a reverse proxy
The background story: I work for a company that develops and manufactures a commercial

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.