Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 52493
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T16:54:56+00:00 2026-05-10T16:54:56+00:00

Our company is considering upgrading our SQL server. At this point, would it be

  • 0

Our company is considering upgrading our SQL server.

At this point, would it be better to upgrade to 2005 or 2008?

Here are some of my considerations:

  • Features
  • Licensing costs
  • Learning curve

Bear in mind our staff has already been using SQL server 2000 for many years.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T16:54:57+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 4:54 pm

    If you’re porting your SQL Server 2000 codebase to SQL Server 2005 or 2008 the effort to go to 2008 is not going to be significantly greater. While 2008 has some features over 2005 the difference is not so great as the jump from 2000 to 2005. I would suggest going straight to SQL Server 2008 with the following major pros and cons to the decision:

    Pros of going to 2008

    • You get another 3 years of lifespan for your systems essentially for free. SQL Server 2008 will be in support for longer than SQL Server 2005. This gives you a longer stretch before you will have to mover over to the new version. IMO this is probably the strongest argument for going straight to SQL Server 2008.

    • You get some features such as geospatial indexing that are not available in SQL Server 2005. While your SQL Server 2000 applications will not use these features initially, you get more options in future without having to do another platform shift. For your porting exercise this doesn’t matter but you buy yourself a little flexibility nearly for free.

    Pros of going to SQL Server 2005

    • It’s less ‘bleeding edge’ than SQL Server 2008 so the implementation path will probably be slightly easier.

    • Recruiting people skilled with SQL Server 2005 will be easier than getting experienced SQL Server 2008 people. However, presumably you will mainly be re-training your existing staff so this is not likely to be a major issue.

    YMMV on some of these points, so you may wish to do some more detailed investigation about the potential issues and see if there are any real benefits or obstacles that are specific to your circumstances.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 117k
  • Answers 118k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Timer timer… May 11, 2026 at 10:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use GROUP_CONCAT SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(bar) FROM TABLE GROUP BY foo; May 11, 2026 at 10:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your code doesn't work because the function is not returning… May 11, 2026 at 10:50 pm

Related Questions

Our company is considering moving from hosting our own servers to EC2 and I
My company is considering changing continuous integration servers (I won't say which one we
Our company is nearing its go live date (and its getting a QA department
My company is experimenting with writing a proxy server using the .NET Fx 3.5

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.