Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8556963
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T15:28:05+00:00 2026-06-11T15:28:05+00:00

Our database is insert inensive (200-500k per night) but update light (maybe a few

  • 0

Our database is insert inensive (200-500k per night) but update light (maybe a few hundred per day).

I need to preserve a history of all changes to the inserted rows themselves for an indefinite period of time (but not the actual insert). I would love to use Change Data Capture but the amount of space required to support this is not avaiable. If I can figure out of to do one of the following, my life would be much easier.

1) Limite change data tracking to UPDATES and DELETES only
2) Cleanup only INSERTS from the CDC tables regularly

In the past, I’d have just used a trigger (which is still not off the table!).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T15:28:06+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 3:28 pm

    I would just use a trigger to capture updates and deletes.

    I don’t think you can tell CDC what DML to pay attention to, and I think it’s quite wasteful to let CDC record all of these inserts only to delete them afterward. That in and of itself is expensive and the fragmentation it will cause will also cause issues for any queries you run against the capture tables (you’ll have lots of mostly-empty pages) as well as the work statistics will have to do to constantly keep the stats up to date.

    You could possible put an instead of insert trigger on the capture table, that just does nothing, but I haven’t tried to do this to even see if it is allowed, and I certainly don’t know what impact that will have on the CDC functions. Possibly worth some investigation, but my original answer still stands even if this hack does work: just use a trigger.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm having to insert values into a new column in our database but I
I'm making an update to our database and would like to update rows that
In our database we have tables which have no single auto-increment primary key but
Our programming team currently uses a database using Win1252 encoding, but the database is
Our database currently doesn't define primary keys on any tables. All of the id
Our database is about to reach 1000 stored procedures. Although we were wise and
Our database schema is stored in a single file that is intended for production
Our database is currently at 64 Gb and one of our apps started to
In our database there is a table which is created with ANSI_NULLS OFF .
We're re-evaluating our database upgrade process for our application to try and remove the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.