Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5994145
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T23:46:36+00:00 2026-05-22T23:46:36+00:00

Our implementation : We have added Auditing using the Audit Trail functionality, to a

  • 0

Our implementation:
We have added Auditing using the Audit Trail functionality, to a Bus Comp to monitor a M:M relationship between itself and a child (with the use of an intersection table.) as per book shelfs –> Specifying Parent–Child Associations for
Audit section in Siebel Applications Administrator Guide.

Viewing the Audit Trail:
1) Using the Audit Trail Screen -> I can find Associate/Disassociate records.
2) Using the Audit Trail Item List 2 Bus Comp to have an Audit Trail Tab for a certain view using the section -> Linking Audit Trail to a Business Component section in Siebel Applications Administrator Guide. And here is The Problem
It does not display Associate/Disassociate Operation records even though it is clearly being recorded and we are able to view it in Audit Trail Screen.

With Audit Trail Item List 2 being a VBC, I’m unable to see the logic of where or why it is not showing these operations?

Thanks in advance for any assistance!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T23:46:36+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 11:46 pm

    Symptoms

    Customer added the association of positions to opportunity for Audit Trail by navigating to:

    Audit Trail
    Select Opportunity
    In the Child BC add the Opportunity/Position link

    Navigate to the Opportunity view, create an Opportunity and change a user in the sales team field.

    In the Audit Trail there are a number of records for Opportunity BCincluding the association and disassociation of positions and the Opportunity history.

    However, in the Opportunity > Audit Trail, the audit trail only shows for the Opportunities, not the position change within the opportunity.
    Cause

    The issue is caused by the search specification in the Opportunity/Audit Trail 2 link
    Solution
    In Siebel Tools, navigate to the ‘Link’ object (if this is hidden you will need to show it by selecting the checkbox in View > Option > Object Explorer)

    Query for the link “Opportunity/Audit trial Item2”

    In the search specification, remove the standard text so this field is empty.

    Re-compile the srf and re-start the server.

    All records show after this change.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In our data access layer at work we have this standard implementation where the
In our COM project, we need to choose between best string class implementation so
We have been using log4net for logging our asp.net web forms application. Our logging
We're using interfaces to represent entity classes in our domain model. We have concrete
Or maybe with our implementation of it. I'm new to the team that wants
I am in the process of converting our logging implementation to use System.Diagnostics.TraceSource. We
We are just upgrading our ASP.Net shop implementation (from simple one) to structure that
In our multi-tier business application we have ObservableCollections of Self-Tracking Entities that are returned
I have developed an array based implementation of a hashTable with several stock names,
Okay, so we have a utility here in-house that generates business-model classes from our

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.