Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6662847
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T02:26:04+00:00 2026-05-26T02:26:04+00:00

Our Qt 4.5 project has a root .pro file that has a SUBDIRS qmake

  • 0

Our Qt 4.5 project has a root .pro file that has a SUBDIRS qmake variable. When qmake is called on this root .pro file, it generates a Makefile that calls “qmake && make” for each sub directory.

Now the problem is that for 100+ sub folders, this takes a long time for a one liner change of an other wise up to date project to be detected. (It takes about 13 seconds, waaay to long.) Running make at the root of the project first changes directory to all the sub dirs and runs a do nothing make, until it finds the one directory it actually needs to do work in. (A work around at the moment is to manually cd into the folder that you know you made a code change in, and just run make. For our eclipse environment, this is to clumsy.)

Ideally only the root .pro file should be tweaked, but I will accept answers that hacks the root Makefile as well.

Any suggestions to reduce the trivial make time would be appreciated.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T02:26:04+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 2:26 am

    This is a classic argument for the recursive make considered harmful theory: Your problem is that you have dozens of single Makefiles instead of one large one. The only way around the predicament is to refactor the .pro files so that only a single Makefile is generated. I don’t know enough about qmake to tell you how to do that, though, sorry.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In C# our maintainance project, we observered that the previous company has a root
Our project has one folder that is not part of the solution. How can
Our issue is that our project has files being downloaded using wget to the
I am implementing some networking stuff in our project. It has been decided that
Our project has a site template that manages custom properties using SPWeb.Properties. However I
The project, I have involved, has an architecture-oriented project's file/folder structure: Root |____ Node1
Our current project has ran into a circular dependency issue. Our business logic assembly
When I compile our project use Delphi 2010 Trial, there has a fatal error
I'm looking to update our project's jaxb version from 1 to 2. Has anyone
We use custom type to represent Identifiers in our project. It has TypeConvertor attached

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.