Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 971335
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T02:56:54+00:00 2026-05-16T02:56:54+00:00

Our team is in a spike sprint to choose between ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ. We

  • 0

Our team is in a spike sprint to choose between ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ. We made 2 little producer/consumer spikes sending an object message with an array of 16 strings, a timestamp, and 2 integers. The spikes are ok on our devs machines (messages are well consumed).

Then came the benchs. We first noticed that somtimes, on our machines, when we were sending a lot of messages the consumer was sometimes hanging. It was there, but the messsages were accumulating in the queue.

When we went on the bench plateform :

  • cluster of 2 rabbitmq machines 4 cores/3.2Ghz, 4Gb RAM, load balanced by a VIP
  • one to 6 consumers running on the rabbitmq machines, saving the messages in a mysql DB (same type of machine for the DB)
  • 12 producers running on 12 AS machines (tomcat), attacked with jmeter running on another machine. The load is about 600 to 700 http request per second, on the servlets that produces the same load of RabbitMQ messages.

We noticed that sometimes, consumers hang (well, they are not blocked, but they dont consume messages anymore). We can see that because each consumer save around 100 msg/sec in database, so when one is stopping consumming, the overall messages saved per seconds in DB fall down with the same ratio (if let say 3 consumers stop, we fall around 600 msg/sec to 300 msg/sec).

During that time, the producers are ok, and still produce at the jmeter rate (around 600 msg/sec). The messages are in the queues and taken by the consumers still “alive”.

We load all the servlets with the producers first, then launch all the consumers one by one, checking if the connexions are ok, then run jmeter.

We are sending messages to one direct exchange. All consumers are listening to one persistent queue bounded to the exchange.

That point is major for our choice. Have you seen this with rabbitmq, do you have an idea of what is going on ?

Thank you for your answers.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 5 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T02:56:55+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:56 am

    It’s always worth
    setting the prefetch count when using basic.consume :

    channel.basicQos(100);
    

    before the channel.basicConsume line in order to ensure you never have
    more than 100 messages queued up in your QueueingConsumer.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Our team is now beginning to look at jumping from 2.0 to 3.5 and
Our team builds and owns a webservices framework. Other teams which actually build the
Our team is just ramping up to use source control through SVN. We are
Our team recently upgraded to TeamCity 4.5.4 but we're having trouble with TeamCity running
Our team is currently working on a large project which makes heavy use of
Our team has just started developing for the Sitecore CMS. We find that after
Our Team Foundation Server has to build three different versions of the same solution.
Our team is growing, but we're also growing specialized. We've already been using ticketing/bug
Our team is faced with slow but serious Javascript memory leak . We have
Our team has recently been working on a logic and data layer for our

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.