Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 670865
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T00:18:38+00:00 2026-05-14T00:18:38+00:00

Our web app needs to be made PCI compliant, i.e. it must not store

  • 0

Our web app needs to be made PCI compliant, i.e. it must not store any credit card numbers. The app is a frontend to a mainframe system which handles the CC numbers internally and – as we have just found out – occasionally still spits out a full CC number on one of its response screens. By default, the whole content of these responses are logged at debug level, and also the content parsed from these can be logged in lots of different places. So I can’t hunt down the source of such data leaks. I must make sure that CC numbers are masked in our log files.

The regex part is not an issue, I will reuse the regex we already use in several other places. However I just can’t find any good source on how to alter a part of a log message with Log4J. Filters seem to be much more limited, only able to decide whether to log a particular event or not, but can’t alter the content of the message. I also found the ESAPI security wrapper API for Log4J which at first sight promises to do what I want. However, apparently I would need to replace all the loggers in the code with the ESAPI logger class – a pain in the butt. I would prefer a more transparent solution.

Any idea how to mask out credit card numbers from Log4J output?

Update: Based on @pgras’s original idea, here is a working solution:

public class CardNumberFilteringLayout extends PatternLayout {
    private static final String MASK = "$1++++++++++++";
    private static final Pattern PATTERN = Pattern.compile("([0-9]{4})([0-9]{9,15})");

    @Override
    public String format(LoggingEvent event) {
        if (event.getMessage() instanceof String) {
            String message = event.getRenderedMessage();
            Matcher matcher = PATTERN.matcher(message);

            if (matcher.find()) {
                String maskedMessage = matcher.replaceAll(MASK);
                @SuppressWarnings({ "ThrowableResultOfMethodCallIgnored" })
                Throwable throwable = event.getThrowableInformation() != null ? 
                        event.getThrowableInformation().getThrowable() : null;
                LoggingEvent maskedEvent = new LoggingEvent(event.fqnOfCategoryClass,
                        Logger.getLogger(event.getLoggerName()), event.timeStamp, 
                        event.getLevel(), maskedMessage, throwable);

                return super.format(maskedEvent);
            }
        }
        return super.format(event);
    }
}

Notes:

  • I mask with + rather than *, because I want to tell apart cases when the CID was masked by this logger, from cases when it was done by the backend server, or whoever else
  • I use a simplistic regex because I am not worried about false positives

The code is unit tested so I am fairly convinced it works properly. Of course, if you spot any possibility to improve it, please let me know 🙂

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T00:18:39+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 12:18 am

    You could write your own layout and configure it for all appenders…

    Layout has a format method which makes a String from a loggingEvent that contains the logging message…

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.