Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3356440
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T02:30:51+00:00 2026-05-18T02:30:51+00:00

Our website needs to give out data to the world. This is open-source data

  • 0

Our website needs to give out data to the world. This is open-source data that we have stored, and we want it to make it publicly available. It’s about 2 million records.

We’ve implemented the search of these records using Lucene, which is fine, however we’d like to show an individual record (say the user clicks on it after the search is done) and provide more detailed information for that record.

This more detailed information however isn’t stored in the index directly… there are like many-to-many relationships and we use our relational database (MySQL) to provide this information.

So like a single record belongs to a category, we want the user to click on that category and show the rest of the records within that category (lots more associations like this).

My question is, should we use Lucene also to store this sort of information and retrieve it through simple search (category:apples), or should MySQL continue doing this logical job? Should I use Lucene only for the search part?

EDIT

I would like to point out that all of our records are pretty static…. changes are made to this data once every week or so.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T02:30:52+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 2:30 am

    Lucene’s strength lies in rapidly building an index of a set of documents and allowing you to search over them. If this “detailed information” does not need to be indexed or searched over, then don’t store it in Lucene.

    Lucene is not a database, it’s an index.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.