Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3939082
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T00:15:31+00:00 2026-05-20T00:15:31+00:00

Performance wise, on a relatively large array (so far the usual count for the

  • 0

Performance wise, on a relatively large array (so far the usual count for the original array is ±20000), which method is best suited to filter it? Blocks or predicates?

Most of the ivars of the contained objects are strings and I want to query those.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T00:15:32+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 12:15 am

    There is one way that blocks could be faster:

    1. You use NSEnumerationConcurrent to enumerate the array.
    2. When you find an object that matches your condition, dispatch another block to a serial queue that adds the object to the result array. (You can’t do this concurrently because NSMutableArrays are not thread safe.)

    However, the documentation doesn’t explicitly say that order will be preserved when enumerating concurrently. I think it’s a good bet that it won’t be. If the order of the array matters, you’d have to re-sort (if that’s even possible), and you’d have to include that in any timing comparison.

    The other ways are to non-concurrently enumerate using blocks and to filter using predicates. filterUsingPredicate: could be faster, since NSArray will have the opportunity to use internal knowledge to build the result array faster than repeated addObject: messages. But that’s merely a possibility; the only way to know for sure would be to compare, and even then, the answer could change at any time (including in the same process, for different input arrays or different objects in the array).

    My advice would be to implement it straightforwardly—using predicates—at first, and then use Instruments to see whether it’s a performance problem. If not, clear code wins. If it is a performance problem, try concurrent enumeration.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

What is the best way (performance wise) to paginate results in SQL Server 2000,
What would be the most optimal algorithm (performance-wise) to calculate the number of divisors
What exactly does null do performance and storage (space) wise in MySQL? For example:
Strange performance outcome, I have a LINQ to SQL query which uses several let
Criteria: Performance, Performance, Performance. I need a way to convert a uint, int, etc
Keeping performance on a mobile device in mind, what do you think is the
For performance reasons, I draw the strings for my UITableViewCell in a custom view
Is there a performance difference between i++ and ++i if the resulting value is
I knew of some performance reasons back in the SQL 7 days, but do
Can the performance of this sequential search algorithm (taken from The Practice of Programming

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.