Perhaps I am doing something wrong while z-normalizing my array. Can someone take a look at this and suggest what’s going on?
In R:
> data <- c(2.02, 2.33, 2.99, 6.85, 9.20, 8.80, 7.50, 6.00, 5.85, 3.85, 4.85, 3.85, 2.22, 1.45, 1.34)
> data.mean <- mean(data)
> data.sd <- sqrt(var(data))
> data.norm <- (data - data.mean) / data.sd
> print(data.norm)
[1] -0.9796808 -0.8622706 -0.6123005 0.8496459 1.7396910 1.5881940 1.0958286 0.5277147 0.4709033 -0.2865819
[11] 0.0921607 -0.2865819 -0.9039323 -1.1955641 -1.2372258
In Python using numpy:
>>> import string
>>> import numpy as np
>>> from scipy.stats import norm
>>> data = np.array([np.array([2.02, 2.33, 2.99, 6.85, 9.20, 8.80, 7.50, 6.00, 5.85, 3.85, 4.85, 3.85, 2.22, 1.45, 1.34])])
>>> data -= np.split(np.mean(data, axis=1), data.shape[0])
>>> data *= np.split(1.0/data.std(axis=1), data.shape[0])
>>> print data
[[-1.01406602 -0.89253491 -0.63379126 0.87946705 1.80075126 1.64393692
1.13429034 0.54623659 0.48743122 -0.29664045 0.09539539 -0.29664045
-0.93565885 -1.23752644 -1.28065039]]
Am I using numpy incorrectly?
I believe that your NumPy result is correct. I would do the normalization in a simpler way, though:
The difference between your two results lies in the normalization: with
ras the R result:Thus, your two results are mostly simply proportional to each other. You may therefore want to compare the standard deviations obtained with R and with Python.
PS: Now that I am thinking of it, it may be that the variance in NumPy and in R is not defined in the same way: for
Nelements, some tools normalize withN-1instead ofN, when calculating the variance. You may want to check this.PPS: Here is the reason for the discrepancy: the difference in factors comes from two different normalization conventions: the observed factor is simply sqrt(14/15) = 0.9660917… (because the data has 15 elements). Thus, in order to obtain in R the same result as in Python, you need to divide the R result by this factor.