Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6598343
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T18:20:04+00:00 2026-05-25T18:20:04+00:00

Please consider : Needs[ErrorBarPlots`]; list = {{223, 231, 167, 245, 292}, {90, 81, 88,

  • 0

Please consider :

Needs["ErrorBarPlots`"];

list = {{223, 231, 167, 245, 292}, {90, 81, 88, 84, 106}}

Where the second list represent the StandardDeviation

 ErrorListPlot[list // Transpose,                   
               PlotRange -> {{0, 6}, {0, 500}}]

enter image description here

I find it very hard to customize those ErrorList Plot. So my ugly attempt to avoid using the package and achieve the filling I wanted :

ListPlot[{(list[[1]] - list[[2]]), (list[[1]] +
           list[[2]]), list[[1]]}, Filling -> {1 -> {2}}, Joined -> True]

enter image description here

Questions :

Is there an ” efficient” way to adjust the appearance using ErrorListPlot ?
If not How would you suggest handling error bar using ListPlot or BarChart ?

I have to mention that I use Joined so as to increase the visibility but, each point represent a different subject so they should not be but : Using ErrorListPlot I could not make the mean visible enough 🙁

EDIT : @Sjoerd

enter image description here

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T18:20:04+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 6:20 pm

    You can use Filling with a normal ListPlot, not joined, to get vertical lines rather than area filling. Then style the dots as you like with PlotStyle. But also check out some of the options to ErrorListPlot. There are options to do what you need.

    ErrorListPlot[list // Transpose, PlotRange -> {{0, 6}, {0, 500}}, 
     PlotStyle -> {AbsolutePointSize[14], AbsoluteThickness[2]}]
    

    According to the documentation, ErrorListPlot takes all the same options as ListPlot.

    enter image description here

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Please consider this site . I'm having trouble stretching the submenu list items in
Please consider case class Foo[A, B <: List[A]](l: B) { ... } or something
Please consider this code: template<typename T> char (&f(T[1]))[1]; template<typename T> char (&f(...))[2]; int main()
Please consider the following code: public class Person ( public string FirstName {get; set;}
Please consider the following java source: package com.stackoverflow; public class CondSpeed { private static
Please consider the following context from Innate : # Default application for Innate def
Please consider the following simple use case: public class Foo { public virtual int
Please consider the following code, struct foo { foo() { std::cout << Constructing! <<
Please consider the following three .NET types: I have an interface, an abstract class,
Please consider the following SQL Server table and stored procedure. create table customers(cusnum int,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.