Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 795557
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T22:29:58+00:00 2026-05-14T22:29:58+00:00

Please consider the following table (created using a corresponding entity) request ——- id requestor

  • 0

Please consider the following table (created using a corresponding entity)

request
-------
id requestor type version items 
1  a         t1   1        5
2  a         t1   2        3
3  b         t1   1        2
4  a         t2   1        4
5  a         t1   3        9 

The above is what I want to achieve. The version field is a calculated field others are user provided.
Basically the request’s version needs to be calculated based on the combination of requestor and the type. The first occurance with a given combination will have a version 1 then version 2 and so on.

I tried various things using @version on a different entity with just the three columns and joining the two entities using ManytoOne etc but I’m not able to get to the desired outcome. I dont want to confuse you with the things I tried.

Since the objective is simple there should be an easier way I suppose?
Can you please help? – any help greatly appreciated!

thanks in advance

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T22:29:59+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 10:29 pm

    The Version annotation is used to specify the version field or property of an entity class that serves as its optimistic lock value. I don’t think this has anything to do with what you’re looking for. Here are some ideas though:

    1. Use a trigger on insert.
    2. Use a SQL View.
    3. Use a provider specific extension for derived attributes like Hibernate’s @Formula (this annotation that lets you map a property to an SQL expression rather than a table column).

    To illustrate the latest option, you could declare something like this:

    @Formula("(select count(r.id)+1 from Request r where r.requestor=requestor and r.type=type and r.id<id)")
    public long getVersion() { return version; }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Please consider following sample table structure: +-------------------------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | Field | Type | Null |
Please consider the following html snippet and its corresponding code with jQuery version 1.3.2:
Please consider the following two entities: @Entity @Table(name = PROFILE) public class Profile extends
Please consider the following SQL Server table and stored procedure. create table customers(cusnum int,
Please consider the following tweets table: tweet_id user_id text ---------------------------- 1 1 lorem ipsum
Please consider the following scripts. Create Table: IF OBJECT_ID('Colortable') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE
Please consider the following HTML: <td> Some Text <table>.....</table> </td> I need to manipulate
Please consider the following code: #include <iostream> #include <typeinfo> template< typename Type > void
Please consider following schema CREATE table articles ( id Int UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
Please consider the following Amount value type property which is marked as a nullable

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.