Question

Please take a look at the following simple code:

class Foo
{
public:
  Foo(){}
  ~Foo(){}

  Foo(const Foo&){}
  Foo& operator=(const Foo&) { return *this; }
};

static Foo g_temp;
const Foo& GetFoo() { return g_temp; }

I tried to use auto like this:

auto my_foo = GetFoo();

I expected that my_foo will be a constant reference to Foo, which is the return type of the function. However, the type of auto is Foo, not the reference. Furthermore, my_foo is created by copying g_temp. This behavior isn’t that obvious to me.

In order to get the reference to Foo, I needed to write like this:

const auto& my_foo2 = GetFoo();
      auto& my_foo3 = GetFoo();

Question: Why does auto deduce the return type of GetFoo as an object, not a reference?

Answer 1

Read this article: Appearing and Disappearing consts in C++

---

Type deduction for auto variables in C++0x is essentially the same as
for template parameters. (As far as I know, the only difference
between the two is that the type of auto variables may be deduced from
initializer lists, while the types of template parameters may not be.)
Each of the following declarations therefore declare variables of type
int (never const int):

auto a1 = i;
auto a2 = ci;
auto a3 = *pci;
auto a4 = pcs->i;

During type deduction for template parameters and auto variables, only
top-level consts are removed. Given a function template taking a
pointer or reference parameter, the constness of whatever is pointed
or referred to is retained:

template<typename T>
void f(T& p);

int i;
const int ci = 0;
const int *pci = &i;

f(i);               // as before, calls f<int>, i.e., T is int
f(ci);              // now calls f<const int>, i.e., T is const int
f(*pci);            // also calls f<const int>, i.e., T is const int

This behavior is old news, applying as it does to both C++98 and
C++03. The corresponding behavior for auto variables is, of course,
new to C++0x:

auto& a1 = i;       // a1 is of type int&
auto& a2 = ci;      // a2 is of type const int&
auto& a3 = *pci;    // a3 is also of type const int&
auto& a4 = pcs->i;  // a4 is of type const int&, too

---

Since you can retain the cv-qualifier if the type is a reference or pointer, you can do:

auto& my_foo2 = GetFoo();

Instead of having to specify it as const (same goes for volatile).

Edit: As for why auto deduces the return type of GetFoo() as a value instead of a reference (which was your main question, sorry), consider this:

const Foo my_foo = GetFoo();

The above will create a copy, since my_foo is a value. If auto were to return an lvalue reference, the above wouldn’t be possible.