Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 528527
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T08:59:46+00:00 2026-05-13T08:59:46+00:00

//portl.cpp namespace FAWN { namespace Sys{ class PortListner { …. Connecter::ConPtr _cur_con; – the

  • 0
//portl.cpp
namespace FAWN {
namespace Sys{

class PortListner {

....
Connecter::ConPtr _cur_con; - the main problem is here

…

//con.cpp
namespace FAWN {
namespace Sys {

class Connecter {

.....
public:

 typedef boost::shared_ptr<Connecter> ConPtr;

…

Moreover, portl.cpp file is included into some other “main” sourse file. And this “other-main” file includes con.cpp too. So if I include con.cpp to portl.cpp – I define Connecter twice (in portl and in main). If I do not include it, compilator doesn’t know what Connecter::ConPtr (or FAWN::sys::Connecter::ConPtr) means and try to use it as defenition of method.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T08:59:46+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 8:59 am

    Put the class Connecter (which you should probably rename to Connector) into a header file (.h instead of .cpp) and add include guards into the file. That is, at the beginning of your con.h file, add lines

    #ifndef CON_H_INCLUDED
    #define CON_H_INCLUDED
    

    and at the very end, add the line

    #endif
    

    This way, even if you #include con.h twice, the second time it will not get read because the symbol CON_H_INCLUDED has been defined on the first time so the #ifndef-#endif pair hides the content.

    This is the common way in C++: put class declarations in .h files that get #included in .cpp files that then actually define the functions.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 387k
  • Answers 388k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can use NUnit: http://www.nunit.org/ May 15, 2026 at 12:16 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Java SE = Standard Edition. This is the core Java… May 15, 2026 at 12:16 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Insert the (?s) modifier in the regex. That's equivalent to… May 15, 2026 at 12:16 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.