Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5934487
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T15:07:16+00:00 2026-05-22T15:07:16+00:00

Possible Duplicate: Any reason to overload global new and delete? In c++ you can

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
Any reason to overload global new and delete?

In c++ you can overload new/ delete operators, are there any benefits in doing so? Since right after calling operator new its result value is sent to the constructor and right before calling operator delete, the destructor is called.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T15:07:17+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 3:07 pm

    The point of overloading is to control the memory allocation. In some cases you want to use your own allocators instead of the standard ones (for example, when you want allocations to be from static pools and not directly from the heap).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: Is there a reason you can not define the access modifier on
Possible Duplicate: Create Generic method constraining T to an Enum Is there any reason
Possible Duplicate: Any way to add HttpHandler programatically in .NET? Is there a way
Possible Duplicate: When do you use Java’s @Override annotation and why? Is there any
Possible Duplicate: Why ‘this’ is a pointer and not a reference? Is there any
Possible Duplicate: Is there any way to render text into DirectWrite???? Hello, all is
Possible Duplicate Why can't I have a non-integral static const member in a class?
Possible Duplicate: Technically why is processes in Erlang more efficient than OS threads? Any
Possible Duplicate: break in a case with return.. and for default If I have
Possible Duplicate: Why does C have a distinction between -> and . ? Lets

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.