Home/ Questions/Q 306547
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-12T07:28:37+00:00

Possible Duplicate: Are there disadvantages to using a generic varchar(255) for all text-based fields?

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
Are there disadvantages to using a generic varchar(255) for all text-based fields?

In MYSQL you can choose a length for the VARCHAR field type. Possible values are 1-255.

But what are its advantages if you use VARCHAR(255) that is the maximum instead of VARCHAR(20)? As far as I know, the size of the entries depends only on the real length of the inserted string.

size (bytes) = length+1

So if you have the word “Example” in a VARCHAR(255) field, it would have 8 bytes. If you have it in a VARCHAR(20) field, it would have 8 bytes, too. What is the difference?

I hope you can help me. Thanks in advance!

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    Check out: Reference for Varchar

    In short there isn’t much difference unless you go over the size of 255 in your VARCHAR which will require another byte for the length prefix.

    The length indicates more of a constraint on the data stored in the column than anything else. This inherently constrains the MAXIMUM storage size for the column as well. IMHO, the length should make sense with respect to the data. If your storing a Social Security # it makes no sense to set the length to 128 even though it doesn’t cost you anything in storage if all you actually store is an SSN.

    • 0