Question

Possible Duplicate:
C++: “std::endl” vs “\n”

I have a simple program I tested and I realise that endl wreaks havoc on my program. Using endl, my program ran in 100+ ms while working with '\n', the time dropped to ~50ms.
Can anyone tell why is there such a difference?

P.S. I did read other posts that somehow explained what each of them are doing, but does std::flush really take so much time?
Or could there be another possible explanation?

Answer 1

endl has extra expensive flush() operation

27.7.3.8 Standard basic_ostream manipulators [ostream.manip]

namespace std {
template <class charT, class traits>
basic_ostream<charT,traits>& endl(basic_ostream<charT,traits>& os);
}
1 Effects: Calls os.put(os.widen(’\n’)), then os.flush().
2 Returns: os.