Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7609479
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T01:10:53+00:00 2026-05-31T01:10:53+00:00

Possible Duplicate: Does a const reference class member prolong the life of a temporary?

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
Does a const reference class member prolong the life of a temporary?

let say that I have a function f:

int f(int x){return x;}

const int &a=f(1);

I know that f(1) is just a temporary and i will be destroyed after this statement, but

  1. does making the reference const will give f(1) a long life ?
  2. if yes, where f(1) is gonna be stored ?
  3. and is that mean that x also did not get destroyed when it run out of scope?
  4. what is the difference between f(1) and x?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T01:10:54+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 1:10 am

    You’re confusing expressions with values.

    1) The lifetime of the temporary value returned by the expression f(1) will have its lifetime extended. This rule is unique for const references.

    2) Anywhere the compiler wants, but probably on the stack.

    3) Maybe. It depends on whether the compiler copied x or performed copy elision. Since the type is int, it doesn’t matter.

    4) Lots of differences. One is the name of a local variable inside int f(int). It is an lvalue. The other is an expression which calls int f(int) and evaluates to an rvalue.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: C++ typedef interpretation of const pointers I just learned that typedef does
Possible Duplicate: What does const mean following a function/method signature? Go ahead laugh at
Possible Duplicate: declaring a const instance of a class Why does C++ require a
Possible Duplicate: Using bind1st for a method that takes argument by reference I have
Possible Duplicate: How does the Google Did you mean? Algorithm work? Suppose you have
Possible Duplicate: Does std::list::remove method call destructor of each removed element? I have a
Possible Duplicate: What does the explicit keyword in C++ mean? explicit CImg(const char *const
Possible Duplicate: uninitialized const I understand that a const object needs to initialized. So
Possible Duplicate: Does Objective-C guarantee the initialization of interface member data? When I declare
Possible Duplicate: Does const-correctness give the compiler more room for optimization? During the last

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.