Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8599609
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T01:26:02+00:00 2026-06-12T01:26:02+00:00

Possible Duplicate: GNU compiler warning “class has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor” I am

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
GNU compiler warning “class has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor”

I am writing an interface for two classes and I get the warning in the title.
Here’s the code:

class GenericSymbolGenerator {
   protected:                     // <== ok 
    ~GenericSymbolGenerator(void) {}

   public:
    virtual GenericSymbolTableCollection* generateSymbolTableCollection(GenericSymbolTableCollection *gst) = 0;
    GenericSymbolGenerator(void) {}
    // ~GenericSymbolGenerator(void) {} // <== warning if used
};

class PascalPredefinedSymbolGenerator : public GenericSymbolGenerator {
   protected:
    ~PascalPredefinedSymbolGenerator(void) {} // <== ok

   public:
    GenericSymbolTableCollection* generateSymbolTableCollection(GenericSymbolTableCollection *pst); // initializes *pst
    PascalPredefinedSymbolGenerator(void) {}
    // ~PascalPredefinedSymbolGenerator(void) {} <== warning if used
};

class PascalSymbolGenerator : public GenericSymbolGenerator {
    protected:
         ~PascalSymbolGenerator(void) {} // <== ok

    public:
     GenericSymbolTableCollection* generateSymbolTableCollection(GenericSymbolTableCollection *st); // initializes st
     PascalSymbolGenerator(void) {}
     // ~PascalSymbolGenerator(void) {} // <== warning if used
};

As long as the constructor/destructor is void there is no issue in declaring the destructor as protected. The problem arises when the class makes use of the heap(the destructor being declared as protected there is no way of freeing the class from the “outside” making the object “indestructible”).
Is there a more convenient approach(aside from going public all the way)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T01:26:03+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 1:26 am

    Classes for use as polymorphic bases should have either a virtual destructor or a protected destructor.

    The reason is that if you have a public, non-virtual destructor, then pretty much any use of it by an external user of the class is unsafe. For example:

    GenericSymbolGenerator *ptr = new PascalPredefinedSymbolGenerator();
    delete ptr; // behavior is undefined, we tried to call the base class destructor
    

    By marking the destructor protected, you prevent the user from deleting a PascalPredefinedSymbolGenerator object via the base class. By making the destructor public and virtual, you get defined behavior when the user deletes through the base class. So pick one of those options.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: add “readonly” to <input > (jQuery) This is so weird, I hope
Possible Duplicate: Find the “#” character in a string with Javascript How do I
Possible Duplicate: Cannot stop ant from generating compiler warnings How to suppress this warning:
Possible Duplicate: How to successfully rewrite old mysql-php code with deprecated mysql_* functions? I
Possible Duplicate: What is the difference between the GNU Makefile variable assignments =, ?=,
Possible Duplicate: GNU C++ how to check when -std=c++0x is in effect? What I
Possible Duplicate: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments I have
Possible Duplicate: How can I get device ID for Admob My activity has a
Possible Duplicate: Does C++ call destructors for global and class static variables? What is
Possible Duplicate: How do I make a request using HTTP basic authentication with PHP

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.