Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 603501
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T16:56:15+00:00 2026-05-13T16:56:15+00:00

Possible Duplicate: Idiomatic object creation in ruby Sometimes it’s useful to assign numerous of

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
Idiomatic object creation in ruby

Sometimes it’s useful to assign numerous of a constructed arguments to instance variables on construction. Other than the obvious method:

def initialize(arg1, arg2, arg3)
  @arg1, @arg2, @arg3 = arg1, arg2, arg3
end

Is there a more concise idiom for achieving the same result? Something like that found in scala for instance:

class FancyGreeter(greeting: String) {
  def greet() = println(greeting)
}

Where in this case the object FancyGreeter has a default constructor that provides assignment for it’s passed arguments.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T16:56:16+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 4:56 pm

    In Ruby 1.8, block arguments and method arguments have different semantics: method arguments have binding semantics, block arguments have assignment semantics.

    What that means is that when you call a method, the method arguments get bound to the values that you pass in. When you call a block, the values get assigned to the arguments.

    So, you can create some pretty crazy looking blocks that way, that seemingly don’t do anything:

    lambda {|@a|}.call(42)
    

    The block body is empty, but because of the argument assignment semantics, the instance variable @a will be assigned the value 42. It works even crazier:

    lambda {|foo.bar|}.call(42)
    

    Yes, attr_writer methods work too. Or what about

    foo = {}
    lambda {|foo[:bar]|}.call(42)
    p foo # => {:bar => 42}
    

    Yup, those too.

    And since you can define methods using blocks, you can do this:

    class FancyGreeter
      define_method(:initialize) {|@greeting|}
      def greet; puts @greeting end
    end
    

    or even

    class FancyGreeter
      attr_accessor :greeting
      define_method(:initialize) {|self.greeting|}
      def greet; puts greeting end
    end
    

    However, I wouldn’t recommend this for two reasons:

    • Not many Rubyists know this, be kind to the people who have to maintain the code after you.
    • In Ruby 1.9 and onwards, block argument semantics are gone, blocks also use method argument semantics, therefore this does no longer work.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: What Ruby IDE do you prefer? I've generally been doing stuff on
Possible Duplicate: Why not use tables for layout in HTML? Under what conditions should
Possible Duplicate: NAnt or MSBuild, which one to choose and when? What is the
Possible Duplicate: How do I calculate someone's age in C#? Maybe this could be
Possible Duplicate: .NET - What’s the best way to implement a catch all exceptions
Possible Duplicate: How does the Google Did you mean? Algorithm work? Suppose you have
Possible Duplicate: How do you send email from a Java app using Gmail? How
Possible Duplicate: JavaScript: var functionName = function() {} vs function functionName() {} What's the
Possible Duplicate: Singleton: How should it be used Following on from Ewan Makepeace 's
Possible Duplicate: Pre & post increment operator behavior in C, C++, Java, & C#

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.