Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8708697
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T04:11:58+00:00 2026-06-13T04:11:58+00:00

Possible Duplicate: If Javascript has first-class functions, why doesn’t this work? When I try

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
If Javascript has first-class functions, why doesn’t this work?

When I try to make an alias function for document.getElementById as below:

f = document.getElementById;

But, when I try to call:

var e_fullname = f(“fullname”);

It was rised an error: Could not convert JavaScript argument

And below is OK:

var e_fullname = f.call(document, “funname”);

Can you tell me why?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T04:11:59+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 4:11 am

    There are four ways of calling a function:

    1. Function invocation: f(p1, p2)
    2. Method invocation: obj.f(p1, p2)
    3. Apply or Call invocation: f.apply(obj, [p1, p2]), f.call(obj, p1, p2)
    4. Constructor invocation: new f(p1, p2)

    In all these cases, f is just a reference (pointer) to a function object (an object with a [[Call]] internal property). What makes it behave different in all these cases is the way the function is called, and that matters a lot.

    So, f is just a reference to the getElementById object, there’s no difference between document.getElementById and someOtherHTMLElement.getElementById; the function doesn’t hold back a reference to the object that references it.

    If you want to bind a certain “owner” object, use the bind method:

    var f = document.getElementById.bind(document);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: If Javascript has first-class functions, why doesn’t this work? In Chrome, the
Possible Duplicate: JavaScript: immediate function invocation syntax A similar question has been asked here
Possible Duplicate: Create instance of “Class” Using “Reflection” in JavaScript Java has Class.forName(XYZClass) to
Possible Duplicate: JavaScript scope and closure What is this for? (function(){ //The code to
Possible Duplicate: JavaScript: var functionName = function() {} vs function functionName() {} AFAIK, there
Possible Duplicate: JavaScript losing “this” object reference with private/public properties Why does the second
Possible Duplicate: JavaScript: Why the anonymous function wrapper? I would like to ask you
Possible Duplicate: JavaScript Function Definition in ASP User Control Hi, I have a generic
Possible Duplicate: Chaining a function in JavaScript? I asked a similar question , but
Possible Duplicate: JavaScript: var functionName = function() {} vs function functionName() {} What is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.