Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8147751
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T14:27:11+00:00 2026-06-06T14:27:11+00:00

Possible Duplicate: Is uninitialized data behavior well specified? I tried the following code #include<stdio.h>

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
Is uninitialized data behavior well specified?

I tried the following code

#include<stdio.h>
void main()
{
int i; \
printf('%d',i);
}

The result gave garbage value in VC++, while same in tc was zero.
What will be the correct value?
Will an uninitialized variable by default have value of zero? or it will contain garbage value?

Next is on the same

#include<stdio.h> 
void main()
{
int i,j,num;
j=(num>0?0:num*num);
printf("\n%d",j);
}

What will be the output of the code above?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T14:27:13+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 2:27 pm

    Technically, the value of an uninitialized non static local variable is Indeterminate[Ref 1].
    In short it can be anything. Accessing such a uninitialized variable leads to an Undefined Behavior.[Ref 2]

    [Ref 1]
    C99 section 6.7.8 Initialization:

    If an object that has automatic storage duration is not initialized explicitly, its value is indeterminate.

    [Ref 2]

    C99 section 3.18 Undefined behavior:

    behavior, upon use of a nonportable or erroneous program construct, of erroneous data, or of indeterminately valued objects, for which this International Standard imposes no requirements.

    Note: Emphasis mine.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: Why do I see strange values when I print uninitialized variables? Fun
Possible Duplicate: uninitialized const I understand that a const object needs to initialized. So
Possible Duplicate: Extracting dollar amounts from existing sql data? I have a column in
Possible Duplicate: Difference of create Index by using include column or not using Edit:
Possible Duplicate: How to successfully rewrite old mysql-php code with deprecated mysql_* functions? I
Possible Duplicate: Matlab gives wrong answer Can anyone explain to me why the following
Possible Duplicate: Singleton: How should it be used Following on from Ewan Makepeace 's
Possible Duplicate: Pre & post increment operator behavior in C, C++, Java, & C#
Possible Duplicate: Uninitialized constant ActiveSupport::Dependencies::Mutex (NameError) Hey I have seen this issue a lot
Possible Duplicate: What happens to a declared, uninitialized variable in C? Does it have

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.