Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6734221
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T10:51:47+00:00 2026-05-26T10:51:47+00:00

Possible Duplicate: “Least Astonishment” in Python: The Mutable Default Argument Okay, so basically I

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
“Least Astonishment” in Python: The Mutable Default Argument

Okay, so basically I have this code:

 # Our Rule type.

class Rule(object):
    """An object to represent a rule and include
    methods to apply these rules."""

    def __init__(self,bind="F",rule=["F"]):
        self.bind = bind
        self.rule = rule

    def show(self):
        try:
            print self.bind
            #print self.rule
            for i in range(len(self.rule)):
                print self.rule[i]
        except:
            print "Incomplete"

    def inflate(self,seq):
        for i in range(len(seq)):
            if seq[i] == self.bind:
                seq[i] = self.rule
            elif type(seq) == type(["X"]):
                seq[i] = self.inflate(seq[i])
        return seq

    def inflate_depth(self,seq,depth):
        while depth > 0:
            seq = self.inflate(seq)
            depth = depth - 1
            print self.rule
        return seq

I call it from another file with this code:

pity = Rule(rule=["R","F","L","F","L","F","R","F"])

seq = ["F"]

inf = pity.inflate_depth(seq,2)

So, I should end up with a list that looks like this:

[['R', [...], 'L', [...], 'L', [...], 'R', [...]]]

Which seems to work fine, but there is one fundamental error.

self.rule

has been altered to contain ['R', [...], 'L', [...], 'L', [...], 'R', [...]]

Why? There is no where whatsoever I assign a new value to that variable, but it changes nonetheless.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T10:51:48+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 10:51 am

    I’m not 100% sure about this but I suspect the problem is that variables in Python are references and not values. That is to say, when you set seq[i] = self.rule, seq[i] points to where self.rule is stored in memory and any changes made to seq[i]‘s value results in a change to self.rule since their values are stored at the same location in memory.

    What you probably should do is deep copy self.rule‘s value into seq[i] rather than simply assign it so that they use two different memory addresses to store their values (see http://docs.python.org/library/copy.html for more information), that way assigning to seq[i] won’t affect self.rule.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: “Least Astonishment” in Python: The Mutable Default Argument This is very odd,
Possible Duplicate: “Least Astonishment” in Python: The Mutable Default Argument I'm kind of confused
Possible Duplicate: “Least Astonishment” in Python: The Mutable Default Argument I'm obviously missing something
Possible Duplicate: “Least Astonishment” in Python: The Mutable Default Argument Consider the following function:
Possible Duplicate: “Least Astonishment” in Python: The Mutable Default Argument I'm very confused about
Possible Duplicate: “Least Astonishment” in Python: The Mutable Default Argument I recently met a
Possible Duplicate: What's wrong with Delphi's “with” I am have a problem debugging code
Possible Duplicate: Weird “406 not acceptable” error following code generate a 406 Not Acceptable
Possible Duplicate: Real differences between “java -server” and “java -client”? I've seen the argument
Possible Duplicate: How to: Back button support “Ajax” I have a ASP.NET MVC implementation

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.