Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9215263
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T02:09:56+00:00 2026-06-18T02:09:56+00:00

Possible Duplicate: Nested using statements in C# I’m a big fan of the using

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
Nested using statements in C#

I’m a big fan of the using statement in C#. I find this:

using (var foo = new ObjectWhichMustBeDisposed())
{
    other code
}

…very much more readable than this:

var foo = new ObjectiWhichMustBeDisposed();

try
{
    other code
}
finally
{
    foo.Dispose();
}

Not only is it more readable, it also prevents accidental use of the foo variable after the using statement (i.e. after it has been disposed), whereas in the second example foo could be used after it had been disposed.

One problem with using, though, is that it tends to lead to very nested code if lots of disposable objects are being created. For example:

using (var foo = new ObjectWhichMustBeDisposed())
{
    using (var bar = new ObjectWhichMustBeDisposed())
    {
        other code
    }
}

If both the objects are of the same type, then you can combine them into a single using statement, like so:

using (var foo = new ObjectWhichMustBeDisposed(),
           bar = new ObjectWhichMustBeDisposed())
{
    other code
}

However, if the objects are not of the same type, then this will not work.

My question is whether it is OK to to achieve a similar end like this:

using (var foo = new ObjectWhichMustBeDisposed())
using (var bar = new OtherObjectWhichMustBeDisposed())
{
    other code
}

In this case, there are no curly-braces after the first using (and hence no need to indent the code). This compiles, and I assume that this works just like an if statement with no braces – i.e. it’ll use the next statment (the second using in this case) as its “body”.

Can anyone confirm whether that’s correct? (The description of the using statement is no help).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T02:09:57+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 2:09 am

    Look at using statement definition in C# standard:

    12.3.3.17 Using statements
    For a using statement stmt of the form:
    using ( resource-acquisition ) embedded-statement

    embedded-statement is whatever from the following (See Item A2.5):

    embedded-statement:
    block
    empty-statement
    expression-statement
    selection-statement
    iteration-statement
    jump-statement
    try-statement
    checked-statement
    unchecked-statement
    lock-statement
    using-statement
    yield-statement

    So both usages of using (block or another using-statement) are absolutely equivalent from C# Standard point of view.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: How can I understand nested ?: operators in PHP? Why does this:
Possible Duplicate: nested php ternary trouble: ternary output != if - else Why this
Possible Duplicate: Nested jQuery.each() - continue/break Here is my code: var steps = $(div#f);
Possible Duplicate: CASE equivalent of a nested IIF statement I'm trying to convert the
Possible Duplicate: How to remove nested parentheses in LISP This is my second quick-and-silly
Possible Duplicate: Nested function parameters and 'this' context in Javascript I'm currently having problems
Possible Duplicate: Nested type problem Let's say I have this code: public class Tree
Possible Duplicate: Nested “from” LINQ query expressed with extension methods I'm sure this has
Possible Duplicate: Breaking out of a nested loop I have this code foreach (___)
Possible Duplicate: How do I make a request using HTTP basic authentication with PHP

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.