Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9241573
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T08:23:36+00:00 2026-06-18T08:23:36+00:00

Possible Duplicate: Performance difference between a wild card import and the required class import

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
Performance difference between a wild card import and the required class import
Implications importing java packages with wildcard

My QA leader set up a checkstyle rule that java.util.* can not appear in the source code, use java.util.XXX instead. For example , you can only write:

import java.util.Date;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Set;
// ... may be thousands import statement here 

but not allowed:

import java.util.*;

If anyone do not follow the rule, QA team will not do the integration test. He told me that the style of import java.util.XXX is more clear than import java.util.*, and makes JVM run faster. Is it true ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T08:23:37+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 8:23 am

    If you include java.util.*, you’re including all of the classes in the java.util package.

    When including java.util.classname, you’re only including the specified class in the java.util package.

    Using java.util.* will not slow down the JVM because imports are handled at compile time, not runtime.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: Why is using a wild card with a Java import statement bad?
Possible Duplicate: Is there a performance difference between i++ and ++i in C++? I
Possible Duplicate: Is there a performance difference between i++ and ++i in C++? In
Possible Duplicate: Performance difference between Primary Key and Unique Clustered Index in SQL Server
Possible Duplicate: Is there a performance difference between BETWEEN and IN with MySQL or
Possible Duplicate: Performance difference between gcc and g++ for C program I was checking
Possible Duplicate: Is there a performance difference between i++ and ++i in C++? They
Possible Duplicate: Performance difference between functions and pattern matching in Mathematica I often find
Possible Duplicate: Is there a REAL performance difference between INT and VARCHAR primary keys?
Possible Duplicate: Is there a performance difference between i++ and ++i in C++? Is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.