Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7702625
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T23:16:09+00:00 2026-05-31T23:16:09+00:00

Possible Duplicate: What does a type followed by _t (underscore-t) represent? Does anyone knows

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
What does a type followed by _t (underscore-t) represent?

Does anyone knows what the ‘t’ in time_t, uint8_t, etc. stands for, is it “type” ?
second, why declare this kind of new types, for instance size_t, couldn’t it be just an int ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T23:16:11+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 11:16 pm

    Yes, the t is for Type.

    The reason for defining the new types is so they can change in the future. As 64-bit machines have become the norm, it’s possible for implementations to change the bit-width of size_t to 64 bits instead of just 32. It’s a way to future-proof your programs. Some small embedded processors only handle 16 bit numbers well. Their size_t might only be 16 bits wide.

    An especially important one might be ptrdiff_t, which represents the difference between two pointers. If the pointer size changes (say to 64 or 128 bits) sometime in the future, your program should not care.

    Another reason for the typedefs is stylistic. While those size_t might just be defined by

    typedef int size_t;
    

    using the name size_t clearly shows that variable is meant to be the size of something (a container, a region of memory, etc, etc).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: What does a type followed by _t (underscore-t) represent? While typing in
Possible Duplicate: What does a type followed by _t (underscore-t) represent? I have seen
Possible Duplicate: Does anyone know of a good C# API for Subversion? I'm designing
Possible Duplicate: How does an underscore in front of a variable in a cocoa
Possible Duplicate: Does SQL Server 2005 have an equivalent to MySql’s ENUM data type?
Possible Duplicate: Java - why no return type based method overloading? The compiler does
Possible Duplicate: g++ “is not a type” error The following does not compile: 1
Possible Duplicate: Why does ASP.NET auto-generated .designer code have the incorrect type? On my
Possible Duplicate: What does template <unsigned int N> mean? Hi ! Are non-type template
Possible Duplicate: C# 'var' vs specific type performance In term of performance does it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.