Possible Duplicate:
What does map(&:name) mean in Ruby?
In Ruby, I know that if I do:
some_objects.each(&:foo)
It’s the same as
some_objects.each { |obj| obj.foo }
That is, &:foo creates the block { |obj| obj.foo }, turns it into a Proc, and passes it to each. Why does this work? Is it just a Ruby special case, or is there reason why this works as it does?
Your question is wrong, so to speak. What’s happening here isn’t "ampersand and colon", it’s "ampersand and object". The colon in this case is for the symbol. So, there’s
&and there’s:foo.The
&callsto_procon the object, and passes it as a block to the method. In Ruby,to_procis implemented onSymbol, so that these two calls are equivalent:So, to sum up:
&callsto_procon the object and passes it as a block to the method, and Ruby implementsto_proconSymbol.