Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7882857
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T04:23:03+00:00 2026-06-03T04:23:03+00:00

Possible Duplicate: What is the explanation for these bizarre JavaScript behaviours mentioned in the

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
What is the explanation for these bizarre JavaScript behaviours mentioned in the 'Wat' talk for CodeMash 2012?

I’m very new to JavaScript. I have a code like this :

<script type="text/javascript">
console.log( []  + {} );
</script>

which on my Google chrome browser logs :

[object Object]

It looks wired to me! And doing something like this :

<script type="text/javascript">
console.log( {} + {} );
</script>

does produce :

[object Object][object Object]

What is exactly happening over here in both the cases? How come [],{} adding these two results in a array of objects?

Thanks in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T04:23:05+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 4:23 am

    When you use the + operator with non-numbers, you’re doing string concatenation, and so the operands are converted to strings. An empty array becomes an empty string because it’s an implicit call to join, and with no entries, join returns an empty string; an object becomes "[object Object]".

    So

    console.log( [] + {} );
    

    …comes down to

    console.log( String([]) + String({}) );
    

    …which comes down to

    console.log( "" + "[object Object]");
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: Plain English explanation of Big O I have always struggled to calculate
Possible Duplicate: Array slicing in Ruby: looking for explanation for illogical behaviour (taken from
Possible Duplicate: New Cool Features of C# 4.0 Hello, There are several(many) questions at
Possible Duplicate: Plain english explanation of Big O I'd imagine this is probably something
Possible Duplicate: adding media element in windows phone 7? I Want Details Explanation and
Possible Duplicate: Big O, how do you calculate/approximate it? Plain English explanation of Big
Possible Duplicate: What is the !! (not not) operator in JavaScript? What does the
Possible Duplicate: What's the shebang/hashbang (#!) in Facebook and new Twitter URLs for? Many
Possible Duplicate: What is System.Void? I have no practical reason for knowing this answer,
Possible Duplicate: Would a multithreaded Java application exploit a multi-core machine very well? I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.