Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3228334
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T16:40:48+00:00 2026-05-17T16:40:48+00:00

Possible Duplicate: Which is the first integer that an IEEE 754 float is incapable

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
Which is the first integer that an IEEE 754 float is incapable of representing exactly?

Firstly, this IS a homework question, just to clear this up immediately. I’m not looking for a spoon fed solution of course, just maybe a little pointer to the right direction.

So, my task is to find the smallest positive integer that can not be represented as an IEEE-754 float (32 bit). I know that testing for equality on something like “5 == 5.00000000001” will fail, so I thought I’d simply loop over all the numbers and test for that in this fashion:

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
    unsigned int i; /* Loop counter. No need to inizialize here. */

    /* Header output */
    printf("IEEE floating point rounding failure detection\n\n");

    /* Main program processing */
    /* Loop over every integer number */
    for (i = 0;; ++i)
    {
        float result = (float)i;

        /* TODO: Break condition for integer wrapping */

        /* Test integer representation against the IEEE-754 representation */
        if (result != i)
            break; /* Break the loop here */
    }

    /* Result output */
    printf("The smallest integer that can not be precisely represented as IEEE-754"
           " is:\n\t%d", i);


    return 0;
}

This failed. Then I tried to subtract the integer “i” from the floating point “result” that is “i” hoping to achieve something of a “0.000000002” that I could try and detect, which failed, too.

Can someone point me out a property of floating points that I can rely on to get the desired break condition?

——————– Update below —————

Thanks for help on this one! I learned multiple things here:

  1. My original thought was indeed correct and determined the result on the machine it was intended to be run on (Solaris 10, 32 bit), yet failed to work on my Linux systems (64 bit and 32 bit).

  2. The changes that Hans Passant added made the program also work with my systems, there seem to be some platform differences going on here that I didn’t expect,

Thanks to everyone!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T16:40:49+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 4:40 pm

    The problem is that your equality test is a float point test. The i variable will be converted to float first and that of course produces the same float. Convert the float back to int to get an integer equality test:

    float result = (float)i;
    int truncated = (int)result;
    if (truncated != i) break;
    

    If it starts with the digits 16 then you found the right one. Convert it to hex and explain why that was the one that failed for a grade bonus.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: Which is faster/best? SELECT * or SELECT column1, colum2, column3, etc What
Possible Duplicate: How do I find out which DOM element has the focus? Is
Possible Duplicate: NAnt or MSBuild, which one to choose and when? What is the
Possible Duplicate: How do I calculate someone's age in C#? Maybe this could be
Possible Duplicate: Why not use tables for layout in HTML? Under what conditions should
Possible Duplicate: .NET - What’s the best way to implement a catch all exceptions
Possible Duplicate: What Ruby IDE do you prefer? I've generally been doing stuff on
Possible Duplicate: How does the Google Did you mean? Algorithm work? Suppose you have
Possible Duplicate: How do you send email from a Java app using Gmail? How
Possible Duplicate: JavaScript: var functionName = function() {} vs function functionName() {} What's the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.