Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Possible Duplicate:
Why are Exceptions not Checked in .NET?
Coming from Eclipse/Java, I noticed that in VisualStudio/C# it is not mandatory to care about Exceptions. While Eclipse forces the user to implement a try-catch-block or to add a throws declaration, this is not the case in Visual Studio.
What is the reason Visual Studio doesn’t inform about unhandled exceptions?
Can I configure Visual Studio to force me to implement try-catch-blocks, or at least add a compiler-warning?
Checked exceptions are not part of .Net, unlike java.
Since the exception does not form a part of the method declaration in c#, any exception can be thrown by any method without the method declaring so. Thus, an exception never requires handling since it is never required to be declared.