Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Possible Duplicate:
Why class fields cannot be var?
I’d like to avoid typing out complex/long type definitions for fields like you can with local variables.
I’d like to know why this couldn’t be done?
public class Foo
{
public var barField = new Dictionary<string, int>(); // Does not work
public void Method()
{
var barLocal = new Dictionary<string, int>(); // Works
}
}
Straight from the source:
Why no
varon fields?