Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8128087
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T07:45:45+00:00 2026-06-06T07:45:45+00:00

Possible Duplicate: Why is string concatenation faster than array join? Usually we need to

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
Why is string concatenation faster than array join?

Usually we need to generate html contents dynamically in Javascript.
Two ways like below:

var s = "", a = [];
for (var i = 0, l = data.length; i < l; i++) {
  s += "<a href='#'>" + data[i].name + "</a>";
  a[i] = "<a href='#'>" + data[i].name + "</a>";
}
container.innerHTML = s; // or
container.innerHTML = a.join("");

Which way is better? Mainly foucus on performance, or the differences can be ignored.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T07:45:47+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 7:45 am

    This answers your question: High-performance String Concatenation in JavaScript

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: String concatenation vs array implode in PHP there are situations in which
Possible Duplicate: JavaScript: How should I generate a lot of HTML? I feel really
Possible Duplicate: JavaScript Variable inside string without concatenation - like PHP In PHP, double
Possible Duplicate: Replace words in a string, but ignore HTML Is it possible to
Possible Duplicate: java String concatenation StringBuilder vs String concatenation in toString() in Java I
Possible Duplicate: String concatenation vs String Builder. Performance Any difference (performance and memory usage)
Possible Duplicate: java String concatenation How to Improve performance of this chunk of code
Possible Duplicate: Modifying C string constants? Pointer to const char vs char array vs
Possible Duplicate: Why to use StringBuffer in Java instead of the string concatenation operator
Possible Duplicate: convert string to 2D array using php I have the string like

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.