Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8722205
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T07:21:27+00:00 2026-06-13T07:21:27+00:00

Pre C++ 11, I often needed to implement two very-alike variants of a method

  • 0

Pre C++ 11, I often needed to implement two very-alike variants of a method to deal with const and non-const usage scenarios of the class/struct:

struct my_struct_t{
     ....
     float_t& at( uint32_t row, uint32_t col)
     {
         return *(((float_t*)((uint8_t*)numbers+row*row_stride)) + col);
     }

     float_t const& at( uint32_t row, uint32_t col) const
     {
         return *(((float_t*)((uint8_t*)numbers+row*row_stride)) + col);
     }

};

Has this changed in C++ 11?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T07:21:29+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 7:21 am

    No.
    It is evident in the Standard Library (it still uses explicit const methods).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The __FILE__ and __LINE__ macros are built into the C Pre-Processor, and are often
I need to pre-produce a million or two PDF files from a simple template
I often heard people saying that stored procedures are pre-compiled. What does it mean?
I often plug pre-configured lambdas into enumerable methods like 'map', 'select' etc. but the
When compiling with ARC, method arguments often appear to be retained at the beginning
Pre-compiled headers seem like they can save a lot of time in large projects,
In the pre ARC era, I could override retain and release and log the
I'm trying to pre-populate create defect popup and I'm not clear on what key/values
I've added a pre-build action for an ASP.NET web control (server control) project, that
I want to pre-append some text a a CSV file that is created by

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.