Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3809628
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T15:20:05+00:00 2026-05-19T15:20:05+00:00

Pretty much that is the question. Is there a way that is more efficient

  • 0

Pretty much that is the question. Is there a way that is more efficient than the standart sitemap.xml to [add/force recrawl/remove] i.e. manage your website’s index entries in google?

I remember a few years ago I was reading an article of an unknown blogger that was saying that when he write news in his website, the url entry of the news will appear immediately in google’s search result. I think he was mentioning about something special. I don’t remember exactly what.. . some automatic re-crawling system that is offered by google themselves? However, I’m not sure about it. So I ask, do you think that I am blundering myself and there is NO OTHER way to manage index content besides sitemap.xml ? I just need to be sure about this.

Thank you.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T15:20:06+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 3:20 pm

    I don’t think you will find that magical “silver bullet” answer you’re looking for, but here’s some additional information and tips that may help:

    • Depth of crawl and rate of crawl is directly influenced by PageRank (one of the few things it does influence). So increasing your site’s homepage and internal pages back-link count and quality will assist you.
    • QDF – this Google algorithm factor, “Query Deserves Freshness”, does have a real impact and is one of the core reasons behind the Google Caffeine infrastructure project to allow much faster finding of fresh content. This is one of the main reasons that blogs and sites like SE do well – because the content is “fresh” and matches the query.
    • XML sitemaps do help with indexation, but they won’t result in better ranking. Use them to assist search bots to find content that is deep in your architecture.
    • Pinging, especially by blogs, to services that monitor site changes like ping-o-matic, can really assist in pushing notification of your new content – this can also ensure the search engines become immediately aware of it.
    • Crawl Budget – be mindful of wasting a search engine’s time on parts of your site that don’t change or don’t deserve a place in the index – using robots.txt and the robots meta tags can herd the search bots to different parts of your site (use with caution so as to not remove high value content).

    Many of these topics are covered online, but there are other intrinsic things like navigational structure, internal linking, site architecture etc that also contribute just as much as any “trick” or “device”.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

That's pretty much the whole question. I've installed Visual C# 2008 Express on a
Pretty much every other editor that isn't a vi descendant (vim, cream, vi-emu) seems
Pretty much what the title says really. We have some code that is .NET
I have heard mention that some desktop applications are pretty much just wrappers for
I've seen it claimed that the following are pretty much equivalent: foo([NSString stringWithString:@blah]) #
Ok, I'm developing an application that has been in pretty much continous development over
Pretty much as the question asks. Answers preferably in pseudo code and referenced. The
Pretty much what the question says. What's the difference between the two classes of
pretty much what the title says. I am using an Ajax Drop Down as
This pretty much has me defeated. On XP and earlier versions of Windows you

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.