Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6963657
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T15:49:19+00:00 2026-05-27T15:49:19+00:00

Problem solved, I missed a +1 when malloc I am doing something on fuse,

  • 0

Problem solved, I missed a +1 when malloc

I am doing something on fuse, and I got a SIGABRT here, and then I use gdb to track that, I found something odd. I get a negative strlen result. I think that’s why when I free my char*, I got this signal.(sprintf may write more bytes then we malloc, so if I malloc a very small number, it still could write things in, but when I free that, the problem comes)

The function is here, the arguments are provided by fuse(A use space filesystem).

static int fs_getattr(const char *path, struct stat *stbuf)

    {
        int res;
        char *fullpath = NULL;
        fullpath = malloc(cpflen+strlen(path));
        sprintf(fullpath, "%s%s", cachepathfix, path);  
        res = lstat(fullpath, stbuf);
        free(fullpath);
    }

I ran gdb to see what’s going on there, at first I thought that may be due to the const char * do not ended by \000, but it actually ended by this

(gdb) x/10c path
0x8937140:  47 '/'  116 't' 101 'e' 115 's' 116 't' 0 '\000'

And then I try p strlen(path), I got a wired number -1218664720

(gdb) p strlen(path)
$2 = -1218664720

Is that I could not use strlen to measure the length of a const char * or other things I’ve done is wrong? Thanks you guys.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T15:49:19+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 3:49 pm

    Add enough space for terminating null character in fullpath.

    Change:

    fullpath = malloc(cpflen+strlen(path));
    

    to:

    fullpath = malloc(sizeof(char) * (cpflen + strlen(path) + 1));
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

PROBLEM SOLVED! STUPID TYPO IN MY CODE! That's my method of my UIScrollView delegate:
I've got this problem that I can't solve. Partly because I can't explain it
I have a problem with static library symbols missed in linked executable. Here is
Problem solved: Thanks guys, see my answer below. I have a website running in
Problem solved, see below Question I'm working in Flex Builder 3 and I have
(Problem solved now, see answers below) Hello, in my app I am trying to
UPDATE: First problem solved, second one described at the bottom of this post. UPDATE2:
Update II Problem Solved but Why? This has been the biggest headache ever. My
Removed link, problem solved The menu at the top is supposed to be a
I solved Problem 10 of Project Euler with the following code, which works through

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.