Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8417205
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T01:58:34+00:00 2026-06-10T01:58:34+00:00

Problem Statement:- In my below program I am using ThreadPoolExecutor with an ArrayBlockingQueue .

  • 0

Problem Statement:-

In my below program I am using ThreadPoolExecutor with an ArrayBlockingQueue.

Each thread needs to use an UNIQUE ID every time and it has to run for 60 minutes or more, So in that 60 minutes it is possible that all the ID's will get finished so I need to reuse those ID’s again. So I am using ArrayBlockingQueue concept here.

Two Scenario:-

  1. If the command.getDataCriteria() contains Previous then each
    thread always needs to use UNIQUE ID between 1 and 1000 and
    release it for reusing again.
  2. Else if the command.getDataCriteria() contains New then each
    thread always needs to use UNIQUE ID between 2000 and 3000 and
    release it for reusing again.

What Problem I am facing currently with the Below Program-

One problem that I am facing is

  • In the run method if the command.getDataCriteria() is Previous then also it gets entered in the else if block(which is for New) which shouldn’t be happening right? and also I am doing an .equals check? Why this is happening? May be because many threads will launch at same time and have modified the command before?

else if(command.getDataCriteria().equals("New")) {

If Multiple Thread is modifying it, then how I can overcome this problem? Whatever problem is happening it’s happening in run method. Any suggestions will be of great help as I am stuck on this from a long time. May be we need to Synchronize the threads, so that no other thread should modify the command when another thread is trying to execute it.

public synchronized void runNextCommand() {

LinkedList<Integer> availableExistingIds = new LinkedList<Integer>();
LinkedList<Integer> availableNewIds = new LinkedList<Integer>();

executorService = new ThreadPoolExecutor(noOfThreads, noOfThreads, 500L, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS,
        new ArrayBlockingQueue<Runnable>(noOfThreads), new ThreadPoolExecutor.CallerRunsPolicy());

    // If there are any free threads in the thread pool
    if (!(((ThreadPoolExecutor) executorService).getActiveCount() < noOfThreads))
    return;

    for (int i = 1; i <= 1000; i++) {
    availableExistingIds.add(i);
    }

    for (int n = 2000; n <= 3000; n++) {
    availableNewIds.add(n);
    }

    BlockingQueue<Integer> existIdPool = new ArrayBlockingQueue<Integer>(1000, false, availableExistingIds);
    BlockingQueue<Integer> newIdPool = new ArrayBlockingQueue<Integer>(1001, false, availableNewIds);

    // Running for particular duration of time
    while(System.currentTimeMillis() <= endTime) {
    Command nextCommand = getNextCommandToExecute();
    Task nextCommandExecutorRunnable = new Task(nextCommand, existIdPool, newIdPool);
    executorService.submit(nextCommandExecutorRunnable);
    }

    executorService.shutdown();
    if (!executorService.awaitTermination(Long.MAX_VALUE, TimeUnit.DAYS)) {
    executorService.shutdownNow();
    }
}

Implementation of runnable (the real unit level command executor)

private static final class Task implements Runnable {
private Command command;
private DPSclient m_DPSclient = null;
private DPSclient psc = null;
private BlockingQueue<Integer> existPool;
private BlockingQueue<Integer> newPool;
private int existId;
private int newId;
private static Object syncObject = new Object();  


public Task(Command command, BlockingQueue<Integer> pool1, BlockingQueue<Integer> pool2) {
    this.command = command;
    this.existPool = pool1;
    this.newPool = pool2;
}

public void run() {

  synchronized(syncObject) {
    if(command.getDataCriteria().equals("Previous")) {
    try {
        // Getting existing id from the existPool
        existId = existPool.take();
        attributeGetSetMethod(existId);
    } catch (Exception e) {
        getLogger().log(LogLevel.ERROR, e.getLocalizedMessage());
    } finally {
        // And releasing that existing ID for re-use
        existPool.offer(existId);       
    }
} else if(command.getDataCriteria().equals("New")) {
     try {
        // Getting new id from the newPool
        newId = newPool.take();
        attributeGetSetMethod(newId);
    } catch (Exception e) {
        getLogger().log(LogLevel.ERROR, e.getLocalizedMessage());
    } finally {
        // And releasing that new ID for re-use
        newPool.offer(newId);   
    }
    }
}
  }
}

I will be appreciating your help into this. Thanks

Update- Code for getNextCommandToExecute method as suggested by Matt

// Get the next command to execute based on percentages
    private synchronized Command getNextCommandToExecute() {
    int commandWithMaxNegativeOffset = 0; // To initiate, assume the first one has the max negative offset
    if (totalExecuted != 0) {
        // Manipulate that who has max negative offset from its desired execution
        double executedPercentage = ((double)executedFrequency[commandWithMaxNegativeOffset] / (double)totalExecuted) * 100;
        double offsetOfCommandWithMaxNegative = executedPercentage - commands.get(commandWithMaxNegativeOffset).getExecutionPercentage();

        for (int j=1; j < commands.size(); j++) {
        double executedPercentageOfCurrentCommand = ((double)executedFrequency[j] / (double)totalExecuted) * 100;
        double offsetOfCurrentCommand = executedPercentageOfCurrentCommand - commands.get(j).getExecutionPercentage();

        if (offsetOfCurrentCommand < offsetOfCommandWithMaxNegative) {
            offsetOfCommandWithMaxNegative = offsetOfCurrentCommand;
            commandWithMaxNegativeOffset = j;
        }
        }
    }

    // Next command to execute is the one with max negative offset
    executedFrequency[commandWithMaxNegativeOffset] ++;
    totalExecuted ++;

    // This is for User Logging/No User Logging and Data is Previous/New
    LinkedHashMap<String, Double> dataCriteriaMap = (LinkedHashMap<String, Double>) sortByValue(commands.get(commandWithMaxNegativeOffset).getDataUsageCriteria());
    Set<Map.Entry<String, Double>> entriesData = dataCriteriaMap.entrySet();
    Iterator<Map.Entry<String, Double>> itData = entriesData.iterator();
    Map.Entry<String, Double> firstEntryData = itData.next();
    Map.Entry<String, Double> secondEntryData = itData.next();

    LinkedHashMap<Boolean, Double> userCriteriaMap = (LinkedHashMap<Boolean, Double>) sortByValue(commands.get(commandWithMaxNegativeOffset).getUserLoggingCriteria());
    Set<Map.Entry<Boolean, Double>> entriesUser = userCriteriaMap.entrySet();
    Iterator<Map.Entry<Boolean, Double>> itUser = entriesUser.iterator();
    Map.Entry<Boolean, Double> firstEntryUser = itUser.next();
    Map.Entry<Boolean, Double> secondEntryUser = itUser.next();

    double percent = r.nextDouble() * 100;

    if (percent < secondEntryData.getValue().doubleValue()) {
        commands.get(commandWithMaxNegativeOffset).setDataCriteria(secondEntryData.getKey());
    } else {
        commands.get(commandWithMaxNegativeOffset).setDataCriteria(firstEntryData.getKey());
    }

    if (percent < secondEntryUser.getValue().doubleValue()) {
        commands.get(commandWithMaxNegativeOffset).setUserLogging(secondEntryUser.getKey());
    } else { 
        commands.get(commandWithMaxNegativeOffset).setUserLogging(firstEntryUser.getKey());
    }

    return commands.get(commandWithMaxNegativeOffset);
    }

And commands has been declared at the top of the class as-

private static List<Command> commands;

Update One More method:-

private synchronized void attributeGetSetMethod(int id_range) {

        requestlTransaction requestlTransaction = null;
        try {
        GUID_VALUES = new LinkedHashMap<Integer, String>();

        // I am not sure how CAL logging has to be done, it has to be at each attribute level or something else? So that is the reason I left this thing.

        if(!(command.getAttributeIDSet().isEmpty())) {

            requestlTransaction = requestlTransactionFactory.create("DPSLnPTest");
            m_DPSclient = setupDPS(command.getName(), getDPSAttributeKeys(command.getDataCriteria(), command.getUserLogging() , id_range));


            for(String attr: command.getAttributeIDSet()) {

            requestlTransaction.setName("DPSAttributeSet");
            requestlTransaction.setStatus("0");
            //requestlTransaction.addData("IpAddress", ipAddress);

            if(attr.contains("/")) {
                lengthOfString = Integer.parseInt(attr.split("/")[1]);
                attr = attr.split("/")[0];
            }
            DPSAttribute attr1 = new DPSAttribute();
            attr1.setRequestAttributeId(new DPSAttributeId(Integer.parseInt(attr)));
            DPSMetadataMgr mgr = DPSMetadataMgr.getInstance();
            DPSRequestAttributeMetadata metadata = mgr.getRequestAttributeMetadataById(Integer.parseInt(attr));
            int maxOccurs = metadata.getMaxOccurs();
            String dataType = metadata.getAttributeTypeAlias();

            DPSAttributeValue attrValue1 = getRequestAttribute(dataType, lengthOfString);

            if(maxOccurs>1) {
                DPSListAttributeValue listAttrValue = new DPSListAttributeValue();
                List<DPSAttributeValue> list = new ArrayList<DPSAttributeValue>();
                list.add(attrValue1);
                listAttrValue.setList(list);
                attr1.setRequestAttributeValue(listAttrValue);
                m_DPSclient.setDPSAttribute(attr1);
            } else {
                attr1.setRequestAttributeValue(attrValue1);         
                m_DPSclient.setDPSAttribute(attr1);
            }
            }

            List<DPSAttribute> idKeys = m_DPSclient.release(PersistenceEnum.COMMIT, false);

            // Iterating through the keys and storing into HashMap
            Iterator<DPSAttribute> i = idKeys.iterator();
            while (i.hasNext()) {
            DPSAttribute DPSAttribute = (DPSAttribute)(i.next());
            DPSAttributeId id = DPSAttribute.getAttributeId();
            DPSAttributeValue value = DPSAttribute.getRequestAttribute();

            if(id.getId() == DPSLnPConstants.CGUID_ID && (value)!= null) {
                DPSLnPConstants.CGUID_VALUE = ((DPSStringAttributeValue)value).getValue();
                GUID_VALUES.put(DPSLnPConstants.CGUID_ID, DPSLnPConstants.CGUID_VALUE);
            } else if(id.getId() == DPSLnPConstants.SGUID_ID && (value)!= null) {
                DPSLnPConstants.SGUID_VALUE = ((DPSStringAttributeValue)value).getValue();
                GUID_VALUES.put(DPSLnPConstants.SGUID_ID, DPSLnPConstants.SGUID_VALUE);
            } else if(id.getId() == DPSLnPConstants.PGUID_ID && (value)!= null) {
                DPSLnPConstants.PGUID_VALUE = ((DPSStringAttributeValue)value).getValue();
                GUID_VALUES.put(DPSLnPConstants.PGUID_ID, DPSLnPConstants.PGUID_VALUE);
            } else if(id.getId() == DPSLnPConstants.UID_ID && (value)!= null) {
                DPSLnPConstants.UID_VALUE = String.valueOf(((DPSLongAttributeValue)value).getValue());
                GUID_VALUES.put(DPSLnPConstants.UID_ID, DPSLnPConstants.UID_VALUE);
            } else if(id.getId() == DPSLnPConstants.SITE_ID && (value)!= null) {
                DPSLnPConstants.SITEID_VALUE = String.valueOf(((DPSIntAttributeValue)value).getValue());
                GUID_VALUES.put(DPSLnPConstants.SITE_ID, DPSLnPConstants.SITEID_VALUE);
            } else if(id.getId() == DPSLnPConstants.ALOC_ID && (value)!= null) {
                DPSLnPConstants.ALOC_VALUE = ((DPSStringAttributeValue)value).getValue();
                GUID_VALUES.put(DPSLnPConstants.ALOC_ID, DPSLnPConstants.ALOC_VALUE);
            } else if(id.getId() == DPSLnPConstants.ULOC_ID && (value)!= null) {
                DPSLnPConstants.ULOC_VALUE = ((DPSStringAttributeValue)value).getValue();
                GUID_VALUES.put(DPSLnPConstants.ULOC_ID, DPSLnPConstants.ULOC_VALUE);
            } else if(id.getId() == DPSLnPConstants.SLOC_ID && (value)!= null) {
                DPSLnPConstants.SLOC_VALUE = ((DPSStringAttributeValue)value).getValue();
                GUID_VALUES.put(DPSLnPConstants.SLOC_ID, DPSLnPConstants.SLOC_VALUE);
            } else if(id.getId() == DPSLnPConstants.PLOC_ID && (value)!= null) {
                DPSLnPConstants.PLOC_VALUE = ((DPSStringAttributeValue)value).getValue();
                GUID_VALUES.put(DPSLnPConstants.PLOC_ID, DPSLnPConstants.PLOC_VALUE);
            }
            }

            // Storing all the locators, guid in a map corresponding to an ID, then later on insert everything directly into db
            GUID_ID_MAPPING.put(id_range, GUID_VALUES);

            // Sleeping the command for particular milliseconds
            // One thing not sure, I should be sleeping the command here or I should put it above this comment line '// Iterating through the keys'
            Thread.sleep(command.getSleepTime());
        } 

        // for get attributes   
        // And also how CAL logging has to be done here too. And we can use same DPS Smart Client that got created above to get the attributes value?

        if(!(command.getAttributeIDGet().isEmpty())) {

            requestlTransaction.setName("DPSAttributeGet");
            requestlTransaction.setStatus("1");
            psc = setupDPS(command.getName(), getDPSAttributeKeys(command.getDataCriteria(), command.getUserLogging() , id_range));

            for(String attr: command.getAttributeIDGet()) {
            DPSAttribute attribute = new DPSAttribute();
            attribute = psc.getDPSAttribute(new DPSAttributeId(Integer.parseInt(attr)));
            //System.out.println(attribute.getAttributeId()+ " " +attribute.getRequestAttribute());
            }
        }
        } catch(Exception e) {
        getLogger().log(LogLevel.ERROR, e);
        } finally {
        requestlTransaction.completed();
        }

    }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T01:58:35+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 1:58 am

    From what I can see if command.getDataCriteria() is supposed to be accessed by only one Thread, then its’ value shouldn’t change due to threading synchronization issues. Assuming this we want to ensure that no two threads obtain a handle to an object instance.

    You have synchronized getNextCommandToExecute() but there is no evidence of synchronizing your commands Collection based on your definition private static List<Command> commands;. If the assumption above is to hold we want to guranteee that no two threads can get() the same object instance from the Collection.

    Where else in the code is the commands Collection being accessed from?

    If commands.get() can be synchronized properly then there shouldn’t be any thread contention on the instance returned. Which ever thread get’s an object owns it.

    …feel free to tell me I’m barking up the wrong tree

    [Edit] following your comments

    It is difficult for me to say for any certainty what’s going wrong because I don’t have all the code and there are assumptions to make. It looks to me like you’re adding the synchronized keyword on many methods and expecting it to solve your problems. I think the best approach is to minimize the lines of code really need synchronizing and this will require a clearer understanding of what really needs to be synchronized.

    1. You don’t want to share references to a Command object across threads so make sure your get() and add() operations on List<Command> commands are synchronized. You could employ the use of a synchronizedList or perhaps a ConcurrentLinkedQueue

    2. Can you make the Command objects immutable? (i.e. no setX() methods)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Problem Statement is:- Each thread uses unique ID between 1 and 1000 and program
I have a problem when trying to execute this update statement (below) using C#
I have a problem with the SQL statement detailed below. The query returns the
Problem statement: Find the right triangle that has integers for all sides and all
I am using the below SP to return the value of Generated Insert statement
I have done a homework assignment, here is the problem statement: Your program should
I'm having a problem, I'm using a text file that has over a million
ExecutorService service = new ThreadPoolExecutor(10, 10, 1000L, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS, new ArrayBlockingQueue<Runnable>(10, true), new ThreadPoolExecutor.CallerRunsPolicy()); Problem
Problem Statement is : Given 2 Dimensional array, print output for example If 4
Problem statement We have one employer that wants to interview N people, and therefore

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.