Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3220718
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T15:47:36+00:00 2026-05-17T15:47:36+00:00

Problem Summary At the moment when using f# I must explicitly coerce a value

  • 0

Problem Summary

At the moment when using f# I must explicitly coerce a value to the parent type of its type in order to get pattern matching expressions to type check correctly. I would ideally like a neater way of doing.

Example

Suppose I have some class hierachy:

type Foo () =
    abstract member Value : unit -> string

type A (i:int) = 
    inherit Foo ()
        override this.Value () = i.ToString()

type B (s:string) = 
    inherit Foo ()
        override this.Value () = s

Ideally, and in some programming languages in normally, I would write the equivalent of the following:

let bar (i:int) : Foo =
    match i with
      | 1 -> B "one"
      | _ -> A i

However this fails to type check correctly, giving me the error, “This expression was expected to have type Foo but here has type B”. I don’t understand why the compiler doesn’t have enough information to infer a common super type for the match expression and then check that the common super type is ‘Foo’.

At present I am forced to provide an explicit coercion for every case in the pattern match:

let bar2 (i:int) : Foo =
    match i with
      | 1 -> (B "one") :> Foo
      | _ -> (A i) :> Foo

I would like to avoid this.

Further Notes

  • Intuition suggests that this is a result of a more general issue. I would have thought though that something as common as pattern matching, or if statements which also exhibit the same property, would have a type checking rule to account for common super types.
  • Before anyone suggests – I appreciate that if A or B were Object Expressions this would work, but my real example is creating instances of C# classes where they are normal classes.
  • Is there a way for me to declare functions to implicitly convert types, as for example scala has, so I could apply automatic conversions for the module where I’m doing this generation?

Thanks for any help on this matter.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T15:47:37+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 3:47 pm

    I would use upcast, a la

    [<AbstractClass>]
    type Foo () = 
        abstract member Value : unit -> string 
    
    type A (i:int) =  
        inherit Foo () 
        override this.Value () = i.ToString() 
    
    type B (s) =  
        inherit Foo () 
        override this.Value () = s 
    
    let bar2 i : Foo = 
        match i with 
        | 1 -> upcast B "one"
        | _ -> upcast A i
    

    You still have to add it to every branch, but this is often preferable to casting to the type, since often the typename is like 20 or 30 characters long (MyNamespace.ThisThingy), whereas upcast is just 6 characters.

    But, briefly, the language rules don’t allow for anything else, the types of all the branches have to be equal.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Problem: I have an address field from an Access database which has been converted
Problem: I have two spreadsheets that each serve different purposes but contain one particular
Problem (simplified to make things clearer): 1. there is one statically-linked static.lib that has
Problem: Ajax suggest-search on [ n ] ingredients in recipes. That is: match recipes
Problem: Given a list of strings, find the substring which, if subtracted from the
Problem is described and demonstrated on the following links: Paul Stovell WPF: Blurry Text
Problem Language: C# 2.0 or later I would like to register context handlers to
Problem I have timestamped data, which I need to search based on the timestamp
Problem solved: Thanks guys, see my answer below. I have a website running in
Problem: We have a web app that calls some web services asynchronously (from the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.