Procedure:
(define (double fn) (lambda (x) (fn (fn x))))
Why can’t the following be computed with the Scheme interpreter:
((((((double double) double) double) double) 1+) 0)
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Sure it can be computed, it’s just that the number of computations is growing exponentially for each
doublethat’s being called … if you wait a very, very long time you’ll eventually get your answer (how long? anything between a couple of hours or a couple of centuries).