Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 454963
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T22:19:23+00:00 2026-05-12T22:19:23+00:00

procedure max (a[1..n]: integers) max := a[1] for i := 2 to n if

  • 0
procedure max (a[1..n]: integers)
    max := a[1]
    for i := 2 to n
        if max < a[i] then max := a[i]

Is the complexity O(1) or O(n) with the best case scenario? The sequence contains n elements. It is pseudocode.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T22:19:23+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 10:19 pm

    There’s no difference between the best case and worst case asymptotic running times for this algorithm. In all cases, you have to traverse the whole array (n elements) and your algorithm would be O(n).

    Theoretically, there’s no way you can find the maximum element of an arbitrary array in less than O(n) since you should always visit each element at least once.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

At all times I use CHARINDEX in stored procedure to check NVARCHAR(MAX) type of
procedure MyProc(Eval: Boolean); begin if not Eval then Exit; /* do stuff */ /*
I have this stored Proc: ALTER Procedure [dbo].[GetWebinars] ( @GroupingCode varchar(max) = 'AVM', @ItemNumber
First we get the max id from the ProductFileLocalName and then - 1000 (as
I need help to return the 'xmlstring' (varchar(MAX)) from a Stored Procedure. It works
In Sql, let's say I have the following procedure GetCars ( @Ids nvarchar(MAX) =
CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.InsertInboxMessage @UserID uniqueIdentifier @Message nvarchar(Max) AS INSERT INTO Messages(UsersID, Messages) VALUES(@UserID, @Message)
I have a stored procedure that return a varbinary(max) type data. I want to
I have a stored procedure that inserts a varchar & VARBINARY(MAX) values in the
I have a SQLServer2008 R2 Stored Procedure that contains an algorithm for parsing out

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.