Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 532085
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T09:22:07+00:00 2026-05-13T09:22:07+00:00

Project is C#. So I have a bunch of multithreaded code that is designed

  • 0

Project is C#.

So I have a bunch of multithreaded code that is designed to be run as a library. It’s in a seperate project from the UI.

My library has a central object that needs to be created before anything that would fire off events is created.

Is it possible for this master object to be passed in some objects so that my events can figure out when they would need to be invoked to get back to the main UI thread?

I’d really like to keep the UI from have to do a bunch of invoking since his event handlers are almost always going to be called from some random background thread.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T09:22:07+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 9:22 am

    From what you’re describing, your best option might be to make all of your objects take a SynchronizationContext as a argument in their constructor.

    If you do that, when you need to raise an event, you can use SyncrhonizationContext.Post to “invoke” the event on the UI thread.

    This way, your library will be UI-agnostic (could work in Windows Forms or WPF), and you can raise events on the UI thread as needed.

    The user of your library would just create your object using SynchronizationContext.Current (which gives you a valid context in Windows Forms and WPF applications, without pulling in a reference to either).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 409k
  • Answers 409k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer CATransition is a subclass of CAAnimation, so it inherits (among… May 15, 2026 at 7:13 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I personally prefer the first style. I like things that… May 15, 2026 at 7:13 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Assuming that the list of tuples has a type IEnumerable<Tuple<int,… May 15, 2026 at 7:13 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.