Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9214179
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T01:55:09+00:00 2026-06-18T01:55:09+00:00

PropertyVersionBase has been marked obsolete for a long while. Currently, it’s the only way

  • 0

PropertyVersionBase has been marked obsolete for a long while.
Currently, it’s the only way to maintain a reference to either Template or DictionaryTemplate, or to either WellLogVersion or DictionaryWellLogVersion, etc.

The confusion with PropertyVersion[Base] is that it was also the base class for e.g. *WellLogVersion, which are fundamentally different from Template classes – a controversial design decision (IMHO) early on in Ocean.

I would appreciate some clarification:

Will this base class eventually be removed?

Will there be a base class for Template and DictionaryTemplate?

Will there be a base class for WellLogVersion and DictionaryWellLogVersion?

In general, where is these class hierarchies going in the future?

(I’d like to tag on a second question: could any base class also expose Droid, pretty please?)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T01:55:10+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 1:55 am

    PropertyVersionBase was marked obsolete in 2012.1, but DictionaryPropertyVersion was missed (it was only deprecated in 2012.2). So due to the Ocean stability promise we will keep both in 2013.1 and remove them in 2014.1.
    There was no plan for base classes so far (Object is the common replacement base). But we may consider to add specific base classes for 2014.1. This would simplify some of our APIs too where the attached template can be dictionary or continuous template.
    Thanks for the suggestion.
    Best Regards,
    Gaelle

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.