Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1027493
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T12:14:54+00:00 2026-05-16T12:14:54+00:00

pthread supports static initialization of pthread_mutex_t using PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER. Is it possible to achieve a

  • 0

pthread supports static initialization of pthread_mutex_t using PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER.

Is it possible to achieve a similar static mechanism for mutex initialization using Windows mutex?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T12:14:55+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 12:14 pm

    No, since Windows mutex are handles, they must be initialized with CreateMutex().

    Note that the static initialization of pthread_mutex_t using PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER is not a real init, it will be done internally at the first call to pthread_mutex_lock() or pthread_mutex_trylock()

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

in pthread library it is possible to find non blocking function: int pthread_mutex_trylock(pthread_mutex_t *mutex);
Using the pthread library in C, is it possible to send a SIGSTOP signal
I am using GCC 4.5.0 with the Eclipse IDE (if that matters) on Windows
I'm using pthreads-win32 to allow threading support for windows. I have a cross platform
I'm using Windows keyed events for custom synchronization primitives, inspired by http://locklessinc.com/articles/keyed_events/ To support
I have a pthread waiting on a condition variable using pthread_cond_wait() . It's waiting
I am using pthread library under Linux for creating threads and I have two
I'm using pthread_mutex_trylock to lock the mutex on a struct so that it can
Does Android support pthreads? And why when i use -pthread option i see the
Unfortunately the cygwin GCC 4.5.3 pthread library implementation doesn't support the POSIX standard function

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.