Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 591847
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T15:40:40+00:00 2026-05-13T15:40:40+00:00

public abstract class ExeCommand { private static object commandHandler; public static object CommandHandler {

  • 0
public abstract class ExeCommand
{
    private static object commandHandler;
    public static object CommandHandler
    {
        get { return commandHandler; }
        set { commandHandler = value; }
    }
}

class ServerCommand : ExeCommand
{
}

This is the bare bones of it.
I want to allow

ExeCommand.CommandHandler = myCommandHandler

but not

ServerCommand.CommandHandler = myCommandHandler

Any way to enforce this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T15:40:41+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 3:40 pm

    It’s unclear what you are trying to achieve here.

    You could prevent ServerCommand.CommandHandler from being writable by declaring the same property but hiding the setter, as Cory points out, but why? The caller could always just use ExeCommand.CommandHandler to assign a value. ServerCommand shares the static members from its base class.

    Perhaps if you could explain what you are trying to achieve a better design could be proposed.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 298k
  • Answers 298k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer So I tried finnw's answer and marked it accepted without… May 13, 2026 at 7:31 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yes, it's because you can't print the strings that are… May 13, 2026 at 7:31 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer ; just ends the statement. GO is not a statement… May 13, 2026 at 7:31 pm

Related Questions

public abstract class ASTNode3 extends ASTNode { ASTNode child1; ASTNode child2; ASTNode child3; public
public abstract class A { public abstract void Process(); } public abstract class B
I have this class: public abstract class AbstractIncomingCall { /* class properties */ public
I have following classes: public abstract class CustomerBase { public long CustomerNumber { get;
I have these classes: public abstract class CustomField { public String Id { get;

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.