Home/ Questions/Q 7795913
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-01T23:12:32+00:00

public class Collections { // Suppresses default constructor, ensuring non-instantiability. private Collections() { }

  • 0
public class Collections {
    // Suppresses default constructor, ensuring non-instantiability.
    private Collections() {
    }
...

All the included methods are static, if I were coding something similar I would have made the Collections.class abstract, but still have a private constructor – why is the class not defined as abstract ?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    A class being abstract implies that it can (and is intended to) be extended, which is not the case with the Collections class. That’s my guess.

    • 0