Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6136153
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T17:34:04+00:00 2026-05-23T17:34:04+00:00

public class Foo { private readonly Bar _bar; } public class Foo2 { private

  • 0
public class Foo
{
    private readonly Bar _bar;
}

public class Foo2
{
    private Bar _bar;
}

I don’t see any benefit to marking it as readonly. It’s private and if I try do something internally to modify it it’s me being dumb since I know how I want my class to behave? So, what’s the point? I don’t think there is any performance gain here, so that can’t be it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T17:34:05+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 5:34 pm

    It’s always nice to have the compiler prevent you from being dumb.

    It’s especially nice to have the compiler prevent other people from being dumb, even if they’re not familiar with the codebase.

    It also serves to tell other people reading your code that the field will never change

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

As an example: public class Foo { private Foo() {} } public class Bar
The class class A private def foo puts :foo end public def bar puts
Is a readonly field in C# thread safe? public class Foo { private readonly
I have a class namespace LogToolsTest { public class Foo { private static readonly
I have a class like this public class foo { private void getThread() {
I'm used to writing classes like this: public class foo { private string mBar
Assuming the following class stub: public class Foo<T> { private Class<T> type; public Foo<T>
I have a class class foo { public: foo(); foo( int ); private: static
Suppose I have the following class: public class Foo { private List<Integer> list =
I have a class Bar with a private field containing the reference type Foo

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.