Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6598081
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T18:17:39+00:00 2026-05-25T18:17:39+00:00

public void foo(){ throw new Exception(foo); } public void bar(){ foo(); } Is it

  • 0
public void foo(){
    throw new Exception("foo");
}


public void bar(){
    foo();
}

Is it possible to inspect the method bar() in order to know that foo() is called without a try catch inside bar()?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T18:17:39+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 6:17 pm

    You may be interested in wrapping the whole class inside a Proxy and watch it with an InvocationHandler:

    http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t18631.html

    Your InvocationHandler would do something special if it sees that “foo” is called immediatly after “bar”, I guess.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

public class Foo<T> { public Foo(Bar bar) { if (bar == null) throw new
class Foo { public: void bar(); }; void Foo::bar() { static int n =
Consider an object declared in a method: public void foo() { final Object obj
I have the following code: public void someMethod() { Set<Foo> fooSet = bar.getFoos(); for(Foo
When I have a method like this: public static void foo(String param) throws IOException
Is it possible to make this test not throw an exception? It appears that
Code below does not run correctly and throws InvalidOperationExcepiton . public void Foo() {
For example public interface X{ public void foo(X i); } public class Y implements
Given a declaration like this: class A { public: void Foo() const; }; What
Just a general question about what the best practice is: public void Foo() {

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.